How Psychology Can Help to Solve the Problem of Fake News
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58894/.vi10.213Keywords:
fake news, disinformation, misinformation, psychology of fake news, nudgeAbstract
The worldwide proliferation of online fake news has attracted considerable scientific attention. Apart from this specific interest in the topic, the determination of many social actors to create mechanisms in order to limit disinformation on the Internet is also quite noticeable. The major social networks are trying to impose adequate regulations within their own platforms in an appropriate and effective way, different countries and international political unions are considering and developing legislative measures against fake news, computer algorithms are being created to recognize false content. However, all these efforts will not bring the intended result if the implemented approach is fundamentally flawed. This article is an attempt to demonstrate how contemporary achievements of psychology and cognitive sciences can inform basically almost all measures against fake news. The current scientific understanding of human behavior could be very helpful in combating online disinformation, if only the planned actions and restrictions are consistent with it.
References
Алкот, Генцкоу 2017: Allcott, H., M. Gentzkow. Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. – Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31 (2), 2017, 211–236
Ариели 2008: Ariely, D. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York: HarperCollins, 2008
Ариели 2010: Ariely, D. The Upside of Irrationality: The Unexpected Benefits of Defying Logic at Work and at Home. New York: HarperCollins, 2010
Ариели 2016: Ariely, D. Payoff: The Hidden Logic That Shapes Our Motivations. New York: TED Books (Simon&Schuster, Inc.), 2016
Аркес, Бьом, Ксу 1991: Arkes, H. R., L. E. Boehm, G. Xu. Determinants of Judged Validity. – Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (27), 1991, 576-605
Аркуб ет. ал. 2020: Arqoub, O. A., A. A. Elega, B. E. Özad, H. Dwikat, F. A. Oloyede. Mapping the Scholarship of Fake News Research: A Systematic Review. – Journalism Practice, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1805791
Ван дер Линден, Роузенбийк 2021: Van der Linden, S., J. Roozenbeek. Psychological Inoculation Against Fake News. In: THE PSYCHOLOGY OF FAKE NEWS. Accepting, Sharing, and Correcting Misinformation. Ed. by R. Greifeneder, M. E. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, N. Schwarz. Oxon: Routledge, 2021, 147-169. DOI: 10.4324/9780429295379
Варго, Гуо, Амазийн 2018: Vargo, C., L. Guo, M. Amazeen. The Agenda-Setting Power of Fake News: A Big Data Analysis of the Online Media Landscape from 2014 to 2016. – new media & society, 20 (5), 2018, 2028-2049. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712086
Вентурини 2019: Venturini, T. From Fake to Junk News, The Data Politics of Online Virality. –In: Data Politics: Worlds, Subjects, Rights. Ed. By: E. Bigo, E. Isin, E. Ruppert. London: Routledge, 2019, 123-144
Канеман 2012: Канеман, Д. Мисленето. София: Изток-Запад, 2012
Канеман, Сибони, Сънстейн 2021: Kahneman, D., O. Sibony, C. R. Sunstein. Noise. A Flaw in Human Judgement. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2021
Ковачева 2019: Ковачева, Р. Фалшива новина ли са фалшивите новини?. – В: Медии и журналистика – Професионалните стандарти между властта и парите. Съст. Б. Златанов, София: ФЖМК, 2019, 64-71
Марков 2020: Марков, С. Фалшиви Новини и Социални Мрежи – Защо и Как Дезинформацията Процъфтява Онлайн. NewMedia21, 2020, Посетена на 1.5.2021. [https://www.newmedia21.eu/analizi/falshivi-novini-i-sotsialni-mrezhi-zashto-i-kak-dezinformatsiyata-protsaftyava-onlajn/]
Мартел, Пеникуук, Ранд 2020: Martel, C., G. Pennycook, D. G. Rand. Reliance on Emotion Promotes Belief in Fake News. – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, 47, (2020) https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3
Марш, Янг 2018: Marsh, E. J., B. W. Yang. Believing Things That Are Not True. A Cognitive Science Perspective on Misinformation. –In: Misinformation and Mass Audiences. Eds.: B. G. Southwell, E. A. Thorson, & L. Sheble. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2018, 15-34
Марш, Стенли 2021: Marsh, E. J., M. L. Stanley. False Beliefs. Byproducts of an Adaptive Knowledge Base? – In: THE PSYCHOLOGY OF FAKE NEWS. Accepting, Sharing, and Correcting Misinformation. Ed. by R. Greifeneder, M. E. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, N. Schwarz. Oxon: Routledge, 2021, 131-146. DOI: 10.4324/9780429295379
Мокану ет ал. 2015: Mocanu, D., L. Rossi, Q. Zhang, M. Karsaib, K. Quattrociocchi. Collective Attention in the Age of (Mis)information. – Computers in Human Behavior, 51(Part B), 2015, 1198–1204
Пеникуук, Кенън, Ранд 2018: Pennycook, G., T. D. Cannon, D. G. Rand. Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 2018, 1865-1880. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465
Пеникуук, Ранд 2019: Pennycook, G., D. Rand. Lazy, Not Biased: Susceptibility to Partisan Fake News is Better Explained by Lack of Reasoning Than by Motivated Reasoning. – Cognition, 188, 2019, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
Пеникуук, Ранд 2021: Pennycook, G., D. G. Rand. The Psychology of Fake News. – Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25 (5), 2021, 388-402 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
Потхаст ет ал. 2018: Potthast, M., J. Kiesel, K. Reinartz, J. Bevendorff, B. Stein. A Stylometric Inquiry into Hyperpartisan and Fake News. The 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Proceedings of the Conference, Vol. 1 (Long Papers), 2018, 231-240, Available from: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-1.pdf
Сонг, Шварц 2008: Song, H., N. Schwarz. Fluency and the Detection of Misleading Questions: Low Processing Fluency Attenuates the Moses Illusion. – Social Cognition, 26, 2008, 791–799.
Суайър, Екер 2018: Swire, B., U. Ecker. Misinformation and it’s Correction. Cognitive Mechanisms and Recommendations for Mass Communication. – In: Misinformation and Mass Audiences. Ed. by B. G. Southwell, E. A. Thorson, & L. Sheble. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2018, 168-182
Талер, Сънстейн 2014: Талер, Р., К. Сънстейн. Побутване. София: Изток-Запад, 2014
Тандок, Лим, Линг 2018: Tandoc E. C., Z. W. Lim, R. Ling. Defining “Fake News”. – Digital Journalism, 6(2), 2018, 137-153
Тополински 2012: Topolinski, S. Nonpropositional Consistency. – In: Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition. Ed. by B. Gawronski & F. Strack. New York: Guilford Press, 2012, 112–13.
Хилбиг 2009: Hilbig, B. E. Sad, Thus True: Negativity Bias in Judgments of Truth. – Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 2009, 983–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.012
Шварц, Жалберт 2021 : Schwarz, N., M. Jalbert. When (Fake) News Feels True: Intuitions of Truth and the Acceptance and Correction of Misinformation. – In: THE PSYCHOLOGY OF FAKE NEWS. Accepting, Sharing, and Correcting Misinformation. Ed. by R. Greifeneder, M. E. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, N. Schwarz. Oxon: Routledge, 2021, 73-89. DOI: 10.4324/9780429295379
Ариели 2019: Ariely, D. How to Change Your Behavior for the Better. TED Talk. Видео на адрес: https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_ariely_how_to_change_your_behavior_for_the_better
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
