The Speech of Hate in the Election Campaigns
Observation of the Parties and Coalitions’ Online Platforms During the Parliamentary Elections on July 11, 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58894/WTWA9930Keywords:
hate speech, doublespeak, political campaignsAbstract
The democratization of the public communications language extends to the election campaigns as well. The desire to find convincing messages that set the political organization apart from its opponents has made us witness a violation of the good tone of political speech. In order to trace the language used during the July 11 parliamentary election campaigns, a review of the online publications of parties and coalitions (websites and Facebook profiles) was conducted. The research shows hostile rhetoric from almost all parties, using different methods of hate speech, incl. doublespeak, veiled hostility, presenting opponents as a public threat, etc.
Its disturbing non-accidental use speaks of an increase in tolerance to hate speech, even in political speech, and this can have dangerous consequences such as fragmentation of society, polarization on important issues and inability to unite around common goals and actions. Recognition of hate speech is part of media literacy and is a tool of protecting against its impact, and making decisions based on correct political messages and specific programs, rather than manipulation.
References
„Насоки за журналисти за омразата на речта“ на АЕЖ България; https://aej-bulgaria.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/not_just_words_2.pdf, стр. 3
СЪОБЩЕНИЕ НА КОМИСИЯТА ДО ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ И СЪВЕТА „По-приобщаваща и защитена Европа: разширяване на списъка на престъпленията в Европа, за да обхване речта на омразата и престъпленията от омраза.“ https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14919-2021-INIT/bg/pdf, стр. 7
„Езикът на омраза в България: рискови зони, уязвими обекти“ http://antihate.europe.bg/sites/default/files/uploads/antihate_index.pdf, ISBN 978-954-9506-39-6, стр. 240-243
„Културни идентичности в интеркултурен диалог“, доц. Диана Петкова; изд. Фабер, ISBN 978-954-400-837-6, стр. 106
Doublespeak: Политическа коректност или език на лъжата в политическия дискурс (Анализ на медийните му прояви) (liternet.bg), проф. Андреана Ефтимова
Ефтимова 2014: Ефтимова, Андреана. Основните политически стилове днес са три.; Любословие, 2014 <http://luboslovie.bg/доц-андреана-ефтимова-има-таблоидизи>
Политическата коректност vs. езика на омразата в полската медийна среда, интервю на проф. д-р Андреана Ефтимова с проф. д-р Войчех Кайтох, 03.12. 2015 г., Newmedia21 https://www.newmedia21.eu/kritika/politicheskata-korektnost-vs-ezika-na-omrazata-v-polskata-medijna-sreda/
Политическата коректност vs. езика на омразата в руската и чешката медийна среда – Newmedia21.eu; интервю на проф. д-р Андреана Ефтимова с проф. д.ф.н. Алла Архангелская https://www.newmedia21.eu/kritika/politicheskata-korektnost-vs-ezika-na-omrazata-v-ruskata-i-cheshkata-medijna-sreda/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.