Perceptions of crisis

Authors

  • Daniela Statulova Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58894/BZVR9870

Keywords:

perception, crisis, diseases of society, communication

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the concepts of perception and crisis in historical and sociocultural terms. Also how crisis is perceived – with negative or positive reactions, respectively as a momentary malaise and suffering from the “diseases of society”, or as an occasion for change and progress in finding meaning. In a problematic situation, crisis is most often perceived as a catastrophic experience, but it has another side – it can be a good opportunity to change direction by overcoming obstacles and making a new beginning in order to achieve a new humanism. The methods of comparative analysis are used for attitudes towards crises in the ancient/modern periods, content analysis of the media language and empirical analysis in the form of a survey. It is not possible to objectively assess the perception of crisis due to the dual nature of the concept, its fluid connotation depending on the context and the blurring of boundaries in its use in everyday speech, political and public discourse, etc.

References

ВЕРНАН 1998: ВЕРНАН, Жан-Пиер. Мит и мислене при древните гърци. Критика и хуманизъм, 1998 [VERNAN, Zhan-Pier. Mit i mislene pri drevnite gartsi. Kritika i humanizam, 1998.].

Господинов 2020: ГОСПОДИНОВ, Георги. Невидимите кризи. София: Жанет 45, 2020 [GOSPODINOV, Georgi. Nevidimite krizi. Sofiya: Zhanet 45, 2020].

Диму 2015: ДИМУ, Никос. Нещастието да си грък. София: ORANGE BOOKS, 2015 [DIMU, Nikos. Neshtastieto da si grak. Sofiya: ORANGE BOOKS, 2015.].

Ефтимова 2016: ЕФТИМОВА, Андреана. Двойственият език в медиите. Езикът на политическата коректност vs езика на омразата. София: Просвета, 2016 [EFTIMOVA, Andreana. Dvoystveniyat ezik v mediite. Ezikat na politicheskata korektnost vs ezika na omrazata. Sofiya: Prosveta, 2016].

ЛЕВИ-БРЮЛЬ 1994: ЛЕВИ-БРЮЛЬ, Люсьен. Сверхъестественное в первобытном мышлении. Москва: Педагогика-Пресс, 1994 [LEVI-BRYULY, Lyusyen. Sverhaestestvennoe v pervobaytnom mayshlenii. Moskva: Pedagogika-Press, 1994].

Петкова 2013: ПЕТКОВА, Дияна. Културни идентичности в интеркултурен диалог. София: Фабер, 2013 [PETKOVA, Diyana. Kulturni identichnosti v interkulturen dialog. Sofiya: Faber, 2013].

Юнг 2015: ЮНГ, К. Г. Човекът и неговите символи. София: Леге Артис, 2015 [YUNG, K. G. Chovekat i negovite simvoli. Sofiya: Lege Artis, 2015].

Интернет източници

Андреев 2023: Андреев, Александър. Неприлично и вулгарно: какво говори Ваня Григорова. [online]. Available from: https://p.dw.com/p/4YVLc

Морен 2020: МОРЕН, Едгар. Хуманология на кризата. – В: Култура. [online]. Available from: https://kultura.bg/article/466-humanologiya-na-krizata-

РБЕ 2024: РЕЧНИК НА БЪЛГАРСКИЯ ЕЗИК. Институтът за български език „Професор Любомир Андрейчин“, БАН [RECHNIK NA BALGARSKIYA EZIK. Institutat za balgarski ezik „Profesor Lyubomir Andreychin“, BAN] [online]. Available from: https://ibl.bas.bg/rbe/lang/bg

Published

2024-09-01

How to Cite

Statulova, D. (2024). Perceptions of crisis. Media and Language, (16), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.58894/BZVR9870

Issue

Section

Media Monitoring