“History of Slavic Literatures”
modern perspectives of a traditional philological discipline
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60056/CCL.2019..140-150Keywords:
history of Slavic literatures, comparative literary studies, philology, academic context, cultural identity, literary typologyAbstract
The article examines the current state of the discipline “History of Slavic Literatures” in the contemporary academic environment. The paper discusses its nature of a large-scale literary-historical course and its perspectives for development in the context of contemporary tendencies in university philological education. We comment the need for the discipline to be conceptually connected to varying perspectives in rationalizing the contexts of cultural identity for different examined literatures.
References
Aretov, N. (2009). Kakvo stoi zad (zhelanieto za) sravnenie? V R. L. Stancheva (Sast.), Golyamoto vpisvane ili Kakvo sravnyava sravnitelnoto literaturoznanie? (s. 34–43). UI „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“.
Burova, A. (2006). Motivirane na slavyanskata literaturna obshtnost v “Istoria na slavyanskite literaturi” ot Yordan Ivanov. V M. Mladenova & I. Monova (Sast.), Slavistika i obshtestvo: Sbornik s dokladite ot Sedmi natsionalni slavistichni chetenia (s. 99–102). Heron press.
Burova, A., Dimitrova, S., Kolev, V., Yanev, K., & Iliev, B. (2019). Modeli na prepodavane na sravnitelni literaturni distsiplini v aktualnia akademichen kontekst. Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum, 5(1).
Georgiev, E. (1958). Ocherki po istoria na slavyanskite literaturi (T. 1). Nauka i izkustvo.
Georgiev, E. (1963). Ocherki po istoria na slavyanskite literaturi (T. 2). Nauka i izkustvo.
Hristova, I. (2019). Yuzhnoslavyanskoto sravnitelno literaturoznanie dnes – posoki i konteksti. Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum, 5(1).
Ivanov, Y. (1896). Istoria na slavyanskite literaturi. Hristo G. Danov.
Karagyozov, P. (1996). Samosoznanie slovesnosti: Istoriografii slavyanskih litteratur. UI „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“.
Karagyozov, P. (2007). Istoria i istoriografia na slavyanskia literaturen XX vek: Tezisi s osoben ogled na „partotsentrichnata“ sashtnost na veka. V H. Balabanova, B. Minkov, & D. Grigorov (Sast.), Pod znaka na evropeyskite kulturni dialozi: V pamet na profesor Boyan Nichev (s. 105–118). UI „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“.
Kovachev, O. (2009). Za polzata i vredata ot termina „zapadnoevropeyska literatura“. V R. L. Stancheva (Sast.), Golyamoto vpisvane ili Kakvo sravnyava sravnitelnoto literaturoznanie? (s. 25–33). UI „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“.
Pencheva, A. (2012). Iztokat i Zapadat na slavyanstvoto i dneshnata sadba na sravnitelnoto slavyansko literaturoznanie. V A. Burova et al. (Sast.), Slavyanite: Obshtestvo, religia, kultura (s. 44–51). UI „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“.
Protohristova, K. (2000). Zapadnoevropeyska literatura: Sapostavitelni nablyudenia, tezisi, idei. Hermes.
Protohristova, K. (2009). Tematologiyata v nastaplenie: Metodologicheski predpostavki i metodologicheski opolzotvoryavania. V R. L. Stancheva (Sast.), Golyamoto vpisvane ili Kakvo sravnyava sravnitelnoto literaturoznanie? (s. 17–24). UI „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“.
Sovet, R. L. N. B., Lipatov, A. V., & Nikolyskiy, S. V. (Red.). (1997–2001). Istoria literatur zapadnыh i yuzhnыh slavyan (T. 1–3). Indrik.
Stancheva, R. L. (2011). Sreshta v prochita: Sravnitelno literaturoznanie i Balkanistika. Balkani.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
