On the relationship between myth and fiction
an approach based on aranda (australian aboriginal) ethnography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60056/CCL.2019..9-26Keywords:
Myth, Fiction, Early childhood interactions, Australian Aborigines, Aranda, Transitional space, Transitional object, Dreaming, Cosmology, RitualAbstract
The author adopts a comparative cultural perspective in order to grasp the social role played by fiction in contemporary Western societies. As Jean-Marie Schaeffer reminds us, fictional competence stems from a child’s early interactions with care-givers. However, cross-cultural studies have identified significant structural differences in how these interactions take place. The author relates these differences to the divergent modes of sociability obtaining in two types of cultural contexts: present-day Western societies in which literary traditions have become central on the one hand, and societies with an oral tradition on the other. The current role of fiction in the West is compared with the processes at play in the creation of mythical narratives among the Aranda, an Aboriginal population of Central Australia. The author shows that whereas both mythological accounts and fictional works are cultural products made to be shared, the form this pooling of knowledge takes, and the functions associated with it, are closely connected with the modes of relational mediation characteristic of the society concerned.
References
Brougere, G. (2005). Jouer/Apprendre. Economica.
Charlesworth, M., Morphy, H., Bell, D., & Maddock, K. (Eds.). (1984). Religion in Aboriginal Australia: An anthology. University of Queensland Press.
Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J. A., & Sharp, D. W. (Eds.). (1971). The cultural context of learning and thinking: An exploration in experimental anthropology. Basic Books.
Dussart, F. (2000). The politics of ritual in an Aboriginal settlement. Smithsonian Institution Press.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. Basic Books.
Lambert, P. (1996). Pistes de réflexion sur l’objet transitionnel en Afrique de l’Ouest. Devenir, 8(3), 21–35.
Langlet, I., & Bréan, S. (2013). Éditorial. ReS Futurae, 2. http://journals.openedition.org.inshs.bib.cnrs.fr/resf/320
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Plon.
Moisseeff, M. (1994). Les objets cultuels aborigènes ou comment représenter l’irreprésentable. Genèses, 17, 4–32.
Moisseeff, M. (1995). Un long chemin semé d'objets cultuels: le cycle initiatique aranda (Les Cahiers de l'Homme). Éditions de L'EHESS.
Moisseeff, M. (2000). The politics of ritual in an Aboriginal settlement. Smithsonian Institution Press.
Moisseeff, M. (2004). La remémoration spatiale des emprunts culturels: une alternative à leur hiérarchisation historique. In M. Espagne (Ed.), L'horizon anthropologique des transferts culturels (Revue germanique internationale 21, pp. 85–104).
Moisseeff, M. (2005). La procréation dans les mythes contemporains: une histoire de science-fiction. Anthropologie et Sociétés, 29(2), 69–94.
Moisseeff, M. (2008a). Nous n'avons jamais été humains. Le néotène, les chimères et les robots. In S. Gruzinski (Ed.), Planète métisse (pp. 152–165). Musée du Quai Branly/Actes Sud.
Moisseeff, M. (2008b). One initiated woman is worth... two: From Polynesia’s ‘Island of Women’ to America’s Alien. In S. Dunis (Ed.), Sexual snakes, winged maidens and sky gods: Myth in the Pacific, an essay in cultural transparency (pp. 141–154). Éditions Haere Po.
Moisseeff, M. (2010a). Relations, rites et cheveux chez les Aranda. In D. Karadimas (Ed.), Poils et sang: un imaginaire de la vitalité (L’Herne, coll. 'Cahiers d'Anthropologie sociale' 6, pp. 131–147). L’Herne.
Moisseeff, M. (2010b). Au cœur du système hiérarchique occidental: l'évolution biologique. In A. Iteanu (Ed.), La cohérence: Mélanges en hommage à Daniel de Coppet (pp. 341–368). Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
Moisseeff, M. (2010c). Les représentations de la procréation dans la science-fiction: de nouveaux supports narratifs pour 'penser' les identités. In K. Slavova & I. Boof-Vermesse (Eds.), Gender / Genre. Genre / Genres (pp. 129–143). St. Kliment Ohridksi University Press.
Moisseeff, M. (2010d). Prishaletsat, ili uzhasat ot razhdaneto v savremennata zapadna mitologia. In M. Kirova & K. Slavova (Eds.), Identities in transition: Gender, media and popular culture in Bulgaria after 1989 (pp. 237–255). Polis.
Moisseeff, M. (2012). L’Objet de la transmission: un choix culturel entre sexe et reproduction. In K.-L. Schwering (Ed.), Se construire comme sujet entre filiation et sexuation (pp. 47–76). Erès.
Moisseeff, M. (2013). Aliens as an invasive reproductive power in science fiction. In K. Daskalova & K. Slavova (Eds.), Gendering popular culture: Perspectives from Eastern Europe and the west (pp. 239–257). Polis.
Moisseeff, M. (2016). Le mort, ses proches et les autres: ici et ailleurs. In A. Caiozzo (Ed.), Mythes, rites et émotions, les funérailles le long de la Route de la soie (Bibliothèque des religions du monde 3, pp. 29–48). Honoré Champion.
Moisseeff, M. (2017). Setting free the son, setting free the widow: Relational transformation in Arrernte life-cycle rituals (Central Australia). Anthropological Forum, 27(1), 34–48.
Moisseeff, M. (2018a). L’inscription spatiale du Rêve: un art de la mémoire et de l’oubli chez les Aranda du désert central australien. In A. Berthoz & J. Scheid (Eds.), Les arts de la mémoire et les images mentales: Réflexions comparatives (Coll. 'Conférences', pp. 177–194). Éditions du Collège de France.
Moisseeff, M. (2018b). Jouir ou se reproduire? Les voies d’autonomisation de l’individu et leurs ressorts idéologiques [Entretien avec Marika Moisseeff par Emmanuel de Vienne]. Terrain, Portraits. http://journals.openedition.org/terrain/16581
Moisseeff, M. (2018c). Extraterrestrial pregnancies and nasal implants: A mythologization of biopower? In B. Penchev et al. (Sast.), Literaturata: Udovolstvia i predizvikatelstva, Yubileen sbornik v chest na prof. Milena Kirova (pp. 129–141). Universitetsko izdatelstvo, Sv. Kl. Ohridski.
Munn, N. (1970). The transformation of subjects into objects in Walbiri and Pitjantjara myth. In R. Berndt (Ed.), Australian Aboriginal anthropology (pp. 141–162). University of Western Australia Press.
Myers, F. (1986). Pintupi country, Pintupi self: Sentiment, place and politics among Western Desert Aborigines. Smithsonian Institution Press/Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Norenzayan, A., Choi, I., & Peng, K. (2007). Perception and cognition. In S. Katayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 569–594). Guilford Press.
Poirier, S. (1992). Cosmologie, personne et expression artistique dans le désert occidental australien. Anthropologie et Sociétés, 16(1), 41–58.
Poirier, S. (1996). Les jardins du nomade. Lit Verlag et CNRS.
Rabain-Jamin, J. (1989). Culture and early social interactions. The example of mother-infant object play in African and native French families. European Journal of Psychology and Education, 4, 295–305.
Rabain-Jamin, J. (1994). Interactions sociales précoces et contexte culturel. Les unités de comparaison. In M. Deleau & A. Weil-Barais (Eds.), Le développement de l’enfant: Approches comparatives (pp. 211–222). PUF.
Rabain-Jamin, J., & Wornham, W. L. (1990). Transformations des conduites de maternage et des pratiques de soin chez les femmes migrantes originaires d'Afrique de l'Ouest. La Psychiatrie de l'Enfant, XXXIII(1), 287–319.
Schaeffer, J.-M. (1999). Pourquoi la fiction? Seuil.
Schiefflin, B. B. (2005). The give and take of everyday life: Language socialization of Kaluli children. Wheatmark. (Original work published 1990)
Spencer, B. S., & Gillen, F. J. (1927). The Arunta. MacMillan.
Stanner, W. E. H. (1966). On Aboriginal religion (Oceania Monograph 11). University of Sydney Press.
Vernant, J.-P. (1982). Mythe et société en Grèce ancienne. François Maspero.
Winnicott, D. W. (1975). Jeu et réalité: L’espace potentiel. Gallimard.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
