On the reconstruction of the verb “to exist” in Proto-semitic
Keywords:
Proto-Semitic, Semitic languages, existential particles, negative existentialsAbstract
The current article proposes an alternative approach to Benjamin Suchard’s reconstruction of the verb *yiytaw (“to exist”) in Proto-Semitic. In his article “Proto-Semitic Existentials: *yθaw and *laθθaw”, Suchard proposes that the original meaning of this verb was “to have”, citing as its derivatives the Akkadian verbs īšu (“to have”) and the negation laššu (“does not exist”), the existential particles yēš (Biblical Hebrew) and ’īt(ay) (“exists”, Aramaic), as well as the negative verb laysa (“does not exist”, “not to be”) in Arabic. While the formal and semantic similarities make Suchard’s idea attractive, an analysis of their usage raises serious questions. This article rejects Suchard’s postulated connections and reconstructs “to exist” in Proto-Semitic as *isu, a verb from which yəhī in Biblical Hebrew and yəhwē in Aramaic are derived, both having the meaning “to be”.
References
D'yakonov, I. (1965), Semito-khamitskiye yazyki. Nauka, Moskva.
D'yakonov, I. (1967), Yazyki drevney peredney Azii. Nauka, Moskva.
Todorov, V. (2022), Monofonemni slovo- i formoobrazuvatelni formanti v semitskite ezitsi: etimologichen alaliz. Universitetsko izdatelstvo "Sv. Kliment Ohridski", Sofia.
Tsereteli, K. G. (1979), Siriyskiy yazyk. Nauka, Moskva.
Al-Jallad, A. (2018), “The Earliest Attestation of laysa and the Implications for Its Etymology”, in Languages, Scripts and Their Uses in Ancient North Arabia (Supplement to the Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 48), 2018, Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 111–119.
Garnier, R., Jacques, G. (2012), “A neglected phonetic law: The assimilation of pretonic yod to a following coronal in North-West Semitic”, in Bulletin of School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 135–145.
Gensler, O. D. (2000), “Why Semitic adverbializers (Akkadian -iš, Syriac -ā’īṯ) Should Not Be Derived from Existential *’īṯ”, in Journal of Semitic Studies, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 233–265.
George, A., Krebernik, M. (2022), “Two Remarkable Vocabularies: Amorite-Akkadian Bilinguals!”, Revue d’assyriologie et d’archéologieorientale, Vol. 116, pp. 113–166.
Huehnergard, J. (1983), “Asseverative *la and Hypothetical *lu/law in Semitic”, in Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 103, No. 3, pp. 569–593.
Lipiński, E. (2001), Semitic Languages: Outline of a Comparative Grammar (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 80), 2-nd ed., Peeters, Leuven.
Rubin, A. D. (2005), Studies in Semitic Grammaticalization (Harvard Semitic Studies 57), Eisenbraun, Winona Lake.
Sivan, D. (2001), A Grammar of the Ugaritic Language, Brill, Leiden-Boston-Köln.
Sjörs, A. (2018), “Historical Aspects of Standard Negation in Semitic”, in Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics, Vol. 91, Brill, Leiden-Boston.
Suchard, B. D. (2023), “Proto-Semiticexistentials: *yθawand, *laθθaw”, Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 65–87.
Tropper, J. (2000), Ugaritische Grammatik (Alter Orient und Altes Testament 273), 1-st ed., Ugarit-Verlag, Münster.
Von Soden, W. (1995), Grundriss der akkadischen Grammatik (Analecta Orientalia 33), 3-rd ed., Pontificio Istituto Biblico, Rome.
