Did he incite them or not
a critical discourse analysis of U.S. president Trump’s speech before the 2021 attack on the Capitol
Keywords:
Donald Trump, critical discourse analysis (CDA), manipulation, political speech, Capitol riot, macrostructureAbstract
The objective of the paper is to analyze the speech Trump delivered ahead of the Jan 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot and to establish if it could be argued that the speech may have manipulated people into marching down Pennsylvania Avenue toward the Capitol and to have incited violence. The adopted analytical approach is Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), and more precisely, van Dijk’s critical approach to textual macrostructures, which combines two key aspects: micro- and macro-level analyses. Van Dijk’s approach allows one to pose questions related to lexical and syntactic elements which emerge as salient in Trump’s speech. I examine 20 segments extracted from the President Donald Trump’s speech. The analysis demonstrates how his words play a major role in steering people into particular beliefs and in inciting violence.
References
Encyclopedia Britannica (2022), “Presidency of Donald Trump”, available at: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Donald-Trump/Presidency (accessed 15.07.2024).
Brown, G., Yule, G. (1983), Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004), “Why ‘an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs the storm’: A corpus-based comparative study of metaphor in British and American political discourse”, Advances in Corpus Linguistics, pp. 133–150, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233509585_Why_an_angel_rides_in (accessed 15.07.2024).
Charteris-Black, J. (2018), Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor (2-nd ed.), Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke and New York.
Fairclough, N. (1995), Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, Longman, London and New York.
Fillmore, C. J. (1975), “An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning”, in Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 123–131, available at: https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v1i0.2315 (accessed 15.07.2024).
Lafta, H. T., Hassan, H., Almawla, F. (2020), “Power and Ideology in Donald Trump’s Speech at the United Nations: A Critical Discourse Analysis”, in International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (5): 5498-5509, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349217097_Power_and_Ideology_in (accessed 15.07.2024).
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Musolff, A. (2006), “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse”, Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), pp. 23–38, available at: doi:10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 (accessed 15.07.2024).
Musolff, A. (2017), “Truths, lies and figurative scenarios – metaphors at the heart of Brexit”, in Journal of Language and Politics 16 (5), pp. 641–657, available at: doi: 10.1075/jlp.16033.mus (accessed 15.07.2024).
Musolff, A. (2019), “Metaphor Framing in Political Discourse”, Mythos-Magazin: Politisches Framing 1, available at: http//www.mythosmagazin.de/politisches_framing/am_metaphor-framing.pdf (accessed 15.07.2024).
Musolff, A. (2021), “Figurative Conceptualisations of the Nation(-State)”, in A. Musolff (ed.) National Conceptualisations of the Body Politic. Cultural Linguistics Experience and Political Imagination, Springer, Singapore, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8740-5_1 (accessed 15.07.2024).
Sun, J. (2007), “Language, Meaning, and World Politics – The Language of the Bush Administration and the Iraq War”, available at: https://scholarsprogram.wcfia.harvard.edu/publications/language-meaning-and-world-politics%E2%80%94-language-bush-administration-and-iraq-war (accessed 15.07.2024).
Thorne, T. (2014), Dictionary of Contemporary Slang (4thed.), Bloomsbury Publishing, London.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1980), Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Van Dijk, T. A.(1988), News as discourse, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995), “Discourse semantics and ideology”, Discourse & Society, 6 (2), pp. 243–289, available at: [suspicious link removed] (accessed 15.07.2024).
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997), “What is Political Discourse Analysis?”, Political Linguistics, 11, pp. 11–52, available at: doi:10.1075/bjl.11.03dij (accessed 15.07.2024).
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998), Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, Thousand Oaks, London; SAGE Publications, New Delhi.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2017), “Socio-Cognitive Discourse Studies”, in Flowerdew, J., J. E. Richardson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse, Routledge, New York, pp. 26–44.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2022), “The Discourse, Cognition, Society Framework”, available at: https://discourses.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Teun-A.-van-Dijk-2022-The-discourse-cognition-society-framework.pdf (accessed 15.07.2024).
