Три дихотомии в арабистиката и ислямознанието

приемственост и промяна, норма и практика, сакрално и профанно

Автори

  • Симеон Евстатиев Софийски университет "Св. Климент Охридски" image/svg+xml Автор

Ключови думи :

културна раздвоеност, културна диглосия, арабски език и литература, ислям, норма и практика, приемственост и промяна, сакрално и профанно

Абстракт

Статията въвежда понятието културна раздвоеност в арабистиката и ислямознанието, като илюстрира концептуализацията му с разискване на едно ново изследване, предприето от Катедрата по арабистика и семитология в Софийския университет „Св. Климент Охридски“. Макар и да включва в обхвата си идеи като споменаваната от някои медиевисти „културна диглосия“, културната раздвоеност е изведена на преден план като по-широко понятие – общ знаменател при разбирането на три ключови взаимно преплитащи се дихотомии в арабистиката и ислямознанието: приемственост и промяна, норма и практика, сакрално и профанно. Подходът позволява да се постигне двояка цел – понятието „културна раздвоеност“ да се представи теоретично, като същевременно се разгледат интердисциплинарните търсения на свързани с арабистиката група учени, занимаващи се с история и култура, лингвистика и литература в рамките на съвместното изследване „Съвременни тенденции в арабистиката и ислямознанието“. Така настоящата студия хвърля светлина и върху по-малко известни сред международната научна аудитория аспекти от дейността на българските арабисти и ислямоведи, която ситуира спрямо някои водещи теми и проблеми в това научно поле. Предложеният анализ съчетава нов теоретичен поглед с методи от историята и антропологията на науката, но вместо да се стреми към формулирането на категорични, „окончателни“ заключения по повдигнатите въпроси, предлага по-скоро моментна снимка – рефлексия „с отворен край“, която би могла да насърчи по-нататъшни изследвания в тази насока.

Литература (библиография)

Dyulgerov, I. (2018), Koranut za religiyata, Sofia: Indologicheska fondatsiya “Iztok-Zapad”

Evstatiev, S. (2018), Salafizmut v Blizkiya iztok i granitsite na vyarata, Sofia: Iztok-Zapad

Evstatieva, G. (2011), Arabskoto stihoznanie, Sofia: Iztok-Zapad

Pavlovitch, P. (2017), Podhodi kum izuchavaneto na ranniya islyam: metod i istoriya, Sofia: UI “Sv. Kliment Ohridski”

Todorov, V. (2007), Slovoizmenenieto v drevnite semitski ezitsi, Sofia: UI “Sv. Kliment Ohridski”

Ahmed, S. (2016), What is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Anderson, B. (2006), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, revised edition, London and New York: Verso [first published 1983].

Aydın, C. (2017), The Idea of the Muslim World: A Global Intellectual History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Badawī, al-Saʿīd Muḥammad (1973). Mustawayāt al-ʻarabiyya al-muʻāṣira fī Miṣr, Cairo: Dār al-Maʻārif.

Beeston, A.F.L. (2017), Arabic Language Today, London and New York: Routledge [first published 1970].

Bohas, G., J.-P. Guillaume and D.E. Kouloughli (2017), The Arabic Linguistic Tradition, London and New York: Routledge [first published in 1990].

Brustad, K. (2017), “Diglossia as Ideology”, in The Politics of Written language in the Arab World: Writing Change, edited by J. Hoigilt and G. Mejdell, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 41–67.

Burke, P.J. and J.E. Stets (2009), Identity Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Chobanova, H. (2018), “The Pedagogy of Arabic Grammar”, in Handbook for Arabic Language Teaching Professionals in the 21st Century, edited by K.M. Wahba, L. England and Z.A. Taha, vol. 2: 344–58.

Chouairi, C. (2009), “Arabic to Where? Some Problems that Ail the Arabic Teaching Industry”, NECTFL Review 64: 35–48.

Cook, Michael (2014), Ancient Religions, Modern Politics: The Islamic Case in Comparative Perspective, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Crone, P. (2004), God’s Rule: Government and Islam, New York: Columbia University Press.

Çınar, M. (2018), “Turkey’s ‘Western’ or ‘Muslim’ identity and the AKP’s civilizational discourse”, Turkish Studies 19 (2): 176–97.

De Somogyi, J. (1961), “My Reminiscences of Ignace Goldziher”, The Muslim World 51 (1): 5–17.

Dimitroff [Kimryanov], Iwan. Abū ‘Abdallāh Muḥammad Ibn Al-Ḥasan Asch-Schaibānī und sein corpus juris “al-ğāmi‘ aṣ-ṣağīr”, Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde, genehmigt von der Philosophischen Fakultät der Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Berlin. Tag der Promotion: 16 Mai 1908.

Eickelman, D.F. (1982), “The Study of Islam in Local Contexts”, Contributions to Asian Studies, 17: 1–16.

El-Zein, Abdul Hamid (1977), “Beyond Ideology and Theology: The Search for the Anthropology of Islam”, Annual Review of Anthropology 6: 227– 54.

Evstatiev, S. (2021a), “Arabic and Semitic Studies at Sofia University and the Shifting Interactions of Bulgaria with the Middle East and Islam”, Philologia 39 (1): 97–100.

Evstatiev, S. (2019), “Milletic Secularism in the Balkans: Christianity, Islam, and Identity in Bulgaria”, Nationalities Papers 47 (1): 87–103.

Evstatiev, S. (2015), “The Qāḍīzādeli Movement and the Revival of Takfīr in the Ottoman Age”, in Accusations of Unbelief in Islam: A Diachronic Perspective on Takfīr, edited by C. Adang, H. Ansari, M. Fierro and S. Schmidtke, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 213– 43.

Evstatiev, S. (2021b), “Salafism as a Contested Concept,” in Knowledge, Authority and Change in Islamic Societies: Studies in Honor of Dale F. Eickelman, edited by A.J. Fromherz and N. Samin, Leiden and Boston: Brill, pp. 172–201.

Feins, D.S. (1997), Wine and Islam: The Dichotomy between Theory and Practice in Early Islamic History, PhD Dissertation, the University of Edinburgh.

Ferguson, C.F. (1959), “Diglossia”, Word 15 (2): 325-40.

Fredericks, D.C. (1998). “Diglossia, Revelation, and Ezekiel’s Inaugural Rite”, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 41 (2): 189–99.

Geertz, C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures, Selected Essays by Clifford Geertz, New York: Basic Books [first published 1964].

Glei, R. and S. Reichmut (2012). “Religion between Last Judgement, Law and Faith: Koranic dīn and Its Rendering in Latin Translations of the Koran”, Religion 42 (2): 247–71.

Hale, H.E. and M. Laruelle (2020), “Rethinking Civilizational Identity from the Bottom Up: A Case Study of Russia and a Research Agenda”, Nationalities Papers 48 (3): 585–602.

Herzfeld, M. (2016), Cultural Intimacy: Social Poetics in the Nation State, 3rd ed., London and New York: Routledge [first published 1997, 2nd ed. 2005].

Kennedy, P.F. (2005), Abu Nuwas: A Genius of Poetry, Oxford: Oneworld.

Krämer, G. (2006). “Drawing Boundaries: Yūsuf al-Qaraḍāwī on Apostasy”, in Speaking for Islam: Religious Authorities in Muslim Societies, edited by G. Krämer and S. Schmidtke, Leiden and Boston: Brill.

Makariev, P. (2017), The Public Legitimacy of Minority Claims: A Central/Eastern European Perspective, London and New York: Routledge.

Marçais, W. (1930), “La Diglossie Arabe”, L’enseignement public 97: 401–9.

Matthee, R. “Alcohol in the Islamic Middle East: Ambivalence and Ambiguity”, Past and Present 222, suppl. 9 (2014): 100–25.

Mejdell, G. (2016), “Erasing Boundaries in Contemporary Written Mixed Arabic”, in From Legal Documents to TV and Internet through Novels: Middle and Mixed Arabic across Written and Oral Genres, edited by J. Lentin and J. Grand’Henry, Leuven: Peeters.

Michalak, L. and K. Trocki (2006), “Alcohol and Islam: An Overview”, Contemporary Drug Problems 33 (4): 523–62.

Miller, K. (2008), “Dialect Koine”, in Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, edited by K. Versteegh et al., Leiden and Boston: Brill, 5 vols., 1: 593–7.

Ong, W.J. (1984), “Orality, Literacy, and Medieval Textualization”, New Literary History 16 (1): 1–12.

Palmer, J. (2007), “Arabic Diglossia: Teaching only the Standard Variety is a Disservice to Students”, Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching 14: 111–22.

Patel, A. (2013), The Arab Nahdah: The Making of the Intellectual and Humanist Movement, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Schacht, J. (1964), An Introduction to Islamic Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press [Clarendon Press Paperbacks, 1982].

Skinner, Q. (1998), Liberty before Liberalism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Suleiman, Y. (2003), The Arabic Language and National Identity: A Study in Ideology, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Suleiman, Y. (2008), “‛Arabiyya”, in Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, edited by K. Versteegh et al., Leiden and Boston: Brill, 5 vols., 1: 173–8.

Versteegh, K. (2014), The Arabic Language, 2nd edition, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press [first published 1997].

Versteegh, K. (2004), “Breaking the Rules without Wanting to: Hypercorrection in Middle Arabic Texts”, in Investigating Arabic: Current Parameters in Analysis and Learning, edited by A. Elgibali, pp. 3–18.

Waardenburg, J. (2002), Islam: Historical, Social and Political Perspectives, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Walters, K. (2021), “The Arabic Language and Identity”, Introduction to The Routledge Handbook of Arabic and Identity, edited by R. Bassiouney and K. Walters, London and New York: Routledge.

Ziolkowski, J.M. (1991), “Cultural Diglossia and the Nature of Medieval Latin Literature”, in The Ballad and Oral Literature, edited by J. Harris, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Файлове за сваляне

Публикуван

2021-12-31

Брой

Раздел (Секция)

ЛИТЕРАТУРА И КУЛТУРА

Как да цитирате

Три дихотомии в арабистиката и ислямознанието: приемственост и промяна, норма и практика, сакрално и профанно. (2021). Филология, 40, 38-57. https://periodicals.uni-sofia.bg/index.php/philology/article/view/3870

Подобни статии

Можете също да прегледате стартирайте разширено търсене за подобни статии във връзка с тази статия.

Най-четените статии от същия автор(и)