Имало ли е подстрекателство, или не
критически дискурсивен анализ на речта на президента на САЩ Доналд Тръмп преди бунта в Капитолия през 2021 г.
Ключови думи :
Доналд Тръмп, критически дискурсивен анализ, манипулация, политическа реч, бунт в Капитолия, макроструктураАбстракт
Целта на статията е да се анализира речта на Тръмп от 6 януари 2021 г., произнесена преди бунта в Капитолия в САЩ, и да се установи дали неговите думи са подтикнали последователите му да нападнат Капитолията. Използваният аналитичен подход е критически дискурсивен анализ, по-конкретно критичният подход на Ван Дайк към текстовите макроструктури, който съчетава две ключови неща – анализ на микро- и макрониво. Неговите методи позволяват да се поставят въпроси, свързани с лексикални и синтактични елементи, които изпъкват в речта на Тръмп. Изследвам 20 сегмента, взети от речта на бившия президент на САЩ Доналд Тръмп. Анализът показва как думите му имат ключова роля в насочването на хората към конкретни убеждения и в подстрекаване към насилие.
Литература (библиография)
Encyclopedia Britannica (2022), “Presidency of Donald Trump”, available at: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Donald-Trump/Presidency (accessed 15.07.2024).
Brown, G., Yule, G. (1983), Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004), “Why ‘an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs the storm’: A corpus-based comparative study of metaphor in British and American political discourse”, Advances in Corpus Linguistics, pp. 133–150, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233509585_Why_an_angel_rides_in (accessed 15.07.2024).
Charteris-Black, J. (2018), Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor (2-nd ed.), Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke and New York.
Fairclough, N. (1995), Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, Longman, London and New York.
Fillmore, C. J. (1975), “An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning”, in Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 123–131, available at: https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v1i0.2315 (accessed 15.07.2024).
Lafta, H. T., Hassan, H., Almawla, F. (2020), “Power and Ideology in Donald Trump’s Speech at the United Nations: A Critical Discourse Analysis”, in International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (5): 5498-5509, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349217097_Power_and_Ideology_in (accessed 15.07.2024).
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Musolff, A. (2006), “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse”, Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), pp. 23–38, available at: doi:10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 (accessed 15.07.2024).
Musolff, A. (2017), “Truths, lies and figurative scenarios – metaphors at the heart of Brexit”, in Journal of Language and Politics 16 (5), pp. 641–657, available at: doi: 10.1075/jlp.16033.mus (accessed 15.07.2024).
Musolff, A. (2019), “Metaphor Framing in Political Discourse”, Mythos-Magazin: Politisches Framing 1, available at: http//www.mythosmagazin.de/politisches_framing/am_metaphor-framing.pdf (accessed 15.07.2024).
Musolff, A. (2021), “Figurative Conceptualisations of the Nation(-State)”, in A. Musolff (ed.) National Conceptualisations of the Body Politic. Cultural Linguistics Experience and Political Imagination, Springer, Singapore, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8740-5_1 (accessed 15.07.2024).
Sun, J. (2007), “Language, Meaning, and World Politics – The Language of the Bush Administration and the Iraq War”, available at: https://scholarsprogram.wcfia.harvard.edu/publications/language-meaning-and-world-politics%E2%80%94-language-bush-administration-and-iraq-war (accessed 15.07.2024).
Thorne, T. (2014), Dictionary of Contemporary Slang (4thed.), Bloomsbury Publishing, London.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1980), Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Van Dijk, T. A.(1988), News as discourse, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995), “Discourse semantics and ideology”, Discourse & Society, 6 (2), pp. 243–289, available at: [suspicious link removed] (accessed 15.07.2024).
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997), “What is Political Discourse Analysis?”, Political Linguistics, 11, pp. 11–52, available at: doi:10.1075/bjl.11.03dij (accessed 15.07.2024).
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998), Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, Thousand Oaks, London; SAGE Publications, New Delhi.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2017), “Socio-Cognitive Discourse Studies”, in Flowerdew, J., J. E. Richardson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse, Routledge, New York, pp. 26–44.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2022), “The Discourse, Cognition, Society Framework”, available at: https://discourses.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Teun-A.-van-Dijk-2022-The-discourse-cognition-society-framework.pdf (accessed 15.07.2024).
