Diderichsens Modell als oberflächliches Linearisierungsapparat für X-bar Grammatiken
Schlagwörter:
sentence structure, Diderichsen sentence model, left periphery, Swedish, Danish, BulgarianAbstract
The article presents a theoretical comparison between the descriptive force of two models of the Mainland Scandinavian sentence (focusing in particular on Swedish and Danish) – the traditional functional model by Paul Diderichsen, split into a front, center, and final field, and the tripartite generative X-бар model, split into a complementiser phrase (CP or CvP for the purposes of the article, also called the contextual phrase f. p. a.), an inflectional phrase (IP or IvP f. p. a.), and a verb phrase (vP or LvP f. p. a.). The text will focus on the left periphery. Based on previous research, the article puts forward the hypothesis that such a comparison could serve as the starting point for the construction of a surface-level linear model of the Bulgarian sentence, similar to the Diderichsen model. Such a model can have potential application as a tertium comparationis in the teaching of Mainland Scandinavian languages to students with L1 Bulgarian, and for foreigners learning Bulgarian as an L2.
Literaturhinweise
Bjerre, Tavs, Eva Engels, Henrik Jørgensen und Sten Vikner. 2008. „Points of convergence between functional and formal approaches to syntactic analysis“. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 82, 131–166.
Brandtler, Johan und David Håkansson. 2017. „V2 eller V3? Om preverbal placering av adverbial i svenskan“. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift, Årgang 35, 11–26.
Brøseth, Heidi, Kristin Melum Eide und Tor A. Åfarli (red.). 2021. Språket som system: norsk språkstruktur. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget Bergen.
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj. 2017. „Træstruktur i en skov af fortolkninger“. Nydanske Sprogstudier NyS 52-53, 11–38.
Cinque, Guglielmo und Luigi Rizzi. 2008. „The Cartography of Syntactic Structures“. STiL – Studies in Linguistics, 2, 43–59.
Cinque, Guglielmo und Luigi Rizzi. 2012. „The Cartography of Syntactic Structures“. In: The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Ed. by Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog, 51–66.
Diderichsen, Paul. 1936. „Prolegomena til en metodisk dansk Syntax“. In: Forhandlinger paa det ottende nordiske Filologmøde i København. Ed. by Ebbe Spang-Hanssen et al., 41–46.
Diderichsen, Paul. 1941. Sætningsbygningen i skaanske Lov. København: Ejnar Munksgaard.
Diderichsen, Paul. 1946. Elementær dansk Grammatik. København: Gyldendal.
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila und Lars Hellan. 1999. „Clitics and Bulgarian clause structure“. In: Eurotyp. Volume 5: Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Ed. by Henk van Riemsdijk, 469–513.
Egerland, Verner. 1998. „On Verb-Second Violations in Swedish and the Hierarchical Ordering of Adverbs“. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, Vol. 61, 1–22.
Eide, Kristin Melum. 2011. „Norwegian (non-V2) declaratives, resumptive elements, and the Wackernagel position“. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34, 179–213.
Fant, Lars, Inge Bartning und Rakel Österberg. 2021. „The left and right periphery in native and non-native speech – A comparative study“. IRAL, 59(1), 87–120.
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 2019. The Syntax of Mainland Scandinavian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Franks, Steven. 2008. „Clitic Placement, Prosody, and the Bulgarian Verbal Complex“. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, Volume 16, Number 1, 91–137.
Gutzmann, Daniel, Katharina Hartmann und Lisa Matthewson. 2020. „Verum focus is verum, not focus: Cross-linguistic evidence“. Glossa, 5(1), 51.
Hansen, Erik und Lars Heltoft. 2003. Grammatik. Syntaks. Roskilde: University of Roskilde.
Hansen, Erik und Lars Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over det danske sprog. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Hansen, Erik. 1970. „Sætningsskema og verbalskemaer“. Nydanske Studier 2, 115–141.
Harizanov, Boris. 2014. On the Mapping from Syntax to Morphophonology. Dissertation. UC Santa Cruz.
Heltoft, Lars. 1986a. „Topologi og Syntaks“. In: Nydanske Studier 16-17, 105–130.
Heltoft, Lars. 1986b. „The V/2 Analysis - A Reply from the Diderichsen Tradition“. In: Scandinavian Syntax. Ed. by Östen Dahl and Anders Holmberg, 50–66.
Heltoft, Lars. 1992a. „Topologiens plads i en sprogteori“. In: Sprogvidenskabelige Arbejdspapirer fra Københavns Universitet 2/1992, 67–98.
Heltoft, Lars. 1992b. „The Topology of Verb Second and SVO Languages“. Copenhagen Studies in Language 15, 13–64.
Heltoft, Lars. 2016. „Topologisk og kombinatorisk syntax som alvorligt ment skelnen“. Ny forskning i grammatik, vol. 23, 71–91.
Herslund, Michael. 1986. „The Double Object Construction in Danish“. In: Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. Ed. by Lars Hellan and Kirsti Koch Christensen, 125–147.
Holmberg, Anders und Christer Platzack. 2005. „The Scandinavian Languages“. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax. Ed. by Guglielmo Cinque and Richard S. Kayne. Oxford University Press, 420–458.
Holmberg, Anders. 2020. „On the Bottleneck Hypothesis of V2 in Swedish“. In: Rethinking verb second. Ed. by Rebecca Woods and Sam Wolfe, 40–60.
Horne, Merle und Mikael Roll. 2012. „Swedish as a [+Continuity] language“. In: Discourse and Grammar. Ed. by Johan Brandtler et al. Lund University, 333–341.
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2012. „What's first?: on the left periphery in Swedish declaratives“. In: Discourse and Grammar. Ed. by Johan Brandtler et al. Lund University, 359–372.
Jørgensen, Henrik. 2009. „The Diderichsen Sentence Model - a flexible tool in syntactic analysis“. Nordlyd 35.
Krapova, Iliana und Guglielmo Cinque. 2003. „On the Order of wh-Phrases in Bulgarian Multiple wh-Fronting“. In: Formal Description of Slavic Languages. Leipzig: Peter Lang, 318–336.
Krapova, Iliana und Guglielmo Cinque. 2005. „Two Asymmetries between Clitic Left and Clitic Right Dislocation in Bulgarian“. In: Organizing Grammar. Ed. by Hans Broekhuis et al. Berlin: De Gruyter, 359–364.
Krapova, Iliana und Guglielmo Cinque. 2008. „Clitic reduplication constructions in Bulgarian“. In: Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages. Ed. by Dalina Kallulli and Liliane Tasmowski. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 257–287.
Lindahl, Filippa und Elisabet Engdahl. 2022. „The pragmatics and syntax of pronoun preposing: A study of spoken Swedish“. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, Vol. 25: 169–219.
Lundquist, Björn. 2018. „Tått. Mer om de preverbala adverbialens syntax, semantik och prosodi“. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift, Årgang 36: 179–195.
Nyvad, Anne Mette, Ken Ramshøj Christensen und Sten Vikner. 2017. „CP-recursion in Danish: A cP/CP-analysis“. The Linguistic Review 34(3): 449–477.
Pentchev, Yordan. 1991. „Nekonfiguratsionni yavleniya v balgarskiya sintaksis“. Balgarski ezik, 6, 521–525.
Platzack, Christer. 1998. Svenskans inre grammatik – det minimalistiska programmet. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Platzack, Christer. 2009. Den fantastiska grammatiken: en minimalistisk beskrivning av svenskan. Lund: Norstedts Förlag.
Platzack, Christer. 2012. „Split topicalization in Swedish and doubling with det“. In: Discourse and Grammar. Ed. by Johan Brandtler et al. Lund University, 411–431.
Platzack, Christer. 2013. „Spurious topic drop in Swedish“. In: In search of universal grammar. Ed. by Terje Lohndal. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 27–50.
Radoev, Konstantin. 2022. „Modeliraneto na shvedskoto izrechenie: nyakoi paraleli mezhdu shemata na Didriksen i X-бар teoriyata“. XVII научна конференция на ФКНФ (2020), 55–74.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. „The fine structure of the left periphery“. In: Elements of grammar. Ed. by Liliane Haegeman. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2. Oxford University Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2019. „Notes on the map of the left periphery in Danish“. In: The Sign of the V: Papers in Honour of Sten Vikner. Ed. by Henrik Jørgensen and Johanna Wood, 489–501.
Rudin, Catherine. 1986. Aspects of Bulgarian Syntax: Complementizers and Wh-Constructions. Ohio: Slavica Publishers.
Tisheva, Yovka und Marina Dzhonova. 2002. „Information Structure and Clitics in TreeBanks“. Proceedings of TLT2002, Sozopol, 231–252.
Tisheva, Yovka und Marina Dzhonova. 2006. „Stariyat 'nov' topik“. Slavistichni chetenia, tom: Slavistika i obshtestvo, 231–237.
Tisheva, Yovka und Marina Dzhonova. 2007. „Za nyakoi slovoredni modeli za topikalizatsia v razgovornata rech“. Trudove na VTU „Sv. Sv. Kiril i Metodiy“, 93–108.
Togeby, Ole. 2003. Fungerer denne sættning? funktionel dansk sproglære. København: Gad.
Togeby, Ole. 2017. „Formel og funktionel grammatik“. Nydanske Sprogstudier 52–53: 107–134.
Vikner, Sten und Henrik Jørgensen. 2017. „En formel vs. en funktionel tilgang till dansk sætningsstruktur“. Nydanske Sprogstudier 52–53: 135–168.
Vikner, Sten, Ken Ramshøj Christensen und Anne Mette Nyvad. 2017. „V2 and cP/ CP“. In: Order and structure in syntax I. Ed. by Laura Bailey & Michelle Sheehan. Berlin: Language Science Press, 313–324.
Vikner, Sten. 1991. „Relative der and other C° elements in Danish“. Lingua 84(2–3): 109–136.
Vikner, Sten. 1999. „Ledstillingen i dansk og government & binding“. In: Sætningsskemaet i generativ grammatik. Ed. by Per Anker Jensen and Peter Skadhauge. Kolding, 83–110.
Vikner, Sten. 2020. Comparison with Diderichsen's (1946) analysis of Danish clause structure. Copenhagen: PhD School, Faculty of Humanities.
Vikner, Sten. 2021a. „Den strukturelle asymmetri mellem det indirekte og det direkte objekt i dansk“. In: MUDS 18. Ed. by Yonathan Goldshtein et al., 499–514.
Vikner, Sten. 2021b. „Den strukturelle asymmetri mellem et objekt og et efterfølgende PP-komplement i dansk“. Ny forskning i grammatik, vol. 28, 157–174.
Zimmerling, Anton. 2021. „Towards the Definition of the Bulgarian Word Order System“. Balcania et Slavia, 1(2): 239–256.
SOURCES OF EXAMPLES
Radoev, Konstantin. Personal examples.
Vikner, Sten. 1999. „Ledstillingen i dansk og government & binding“. In: Sætningsskemaet i generativ grammatik. Kolding: Syddansk Universitet.
Vikner, Sten. 2020. Comparison with Diderichsen's (1946) analysis of Danish clause structure. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Vikner, Sten und Henrik Jørgensen. 2017. „En formel vs. en funktionel tilgang til dansk sætningsstruktur“. Nydanske Sprogstudier NyS 52-53: 135–168.
