Dialogues, continuity, openness
comparative perspectives in the 21st century
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.60056/CCL.2025..11-25Ключови думи :
comparative literature, post-classical literary comparatism, openness, dialogue, continuity, interdisciplinaryАбстракт
This article is an introduction to the thematic section of the journal Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum (volume 11, 2025). The paper is dedicated to the theme “Dialogues, Continuity, Openness: Comparative Perspectives in the 21st century”. A definition of the three concepts is proposed in the light of the key stages in the evolution of French comparative literature throughout the 20th and into the 21st century. The transition from classical comparatism to post-classical comparatism presupposes the diversification of methods and a certain decompartmentalisation of disciplines. Each of the articles presented in this introduction follows (at least) one comparative line in accordance with the new paths taken by the discipline: dialogues between literature and the arts or sciences, dialogues between continents (Europe and Africa), between periods (the Middle Ages and the contemporary period), parallels between similar women’s writings, but also between feminist solidarities and writings, and finally, the continuity of classical comparative studies, which are evolving towards a post-classical broadening of the subjects, objects, and methods.
Литература (библиография)
Aretov, N. (2007). Interdistsiplinarnostta: Nachin na upotreba. CALIC. Retrieved from https://calic-bg.eu/conferens/interdisciplinarity/51-interdisciplinarity-how-to-use-it.html
Georgiev, N. (1987). Malchalivite dialozi v literaturata . Ezik i literatura, (1). Retrieved from https://liternet.bg/publish/ngeorgiev/m_s/malch.htm
Kirova, D. (2020). Mediyni dialozi. Nyamo kino - nemskoezichna literatura ot nachaloto na XX vek. UI „Episkop Konstantin Preslavski“.
Kolarova, V. (2007). Interartistichniyat fenomen prez « Opiti » na Montaigne i « Mobile » na Butor, «Katalonskata gradina » na Butor i Badin.... . Prostranstvo & forma.
Protohristova, K. (Ed.). (2008). Mozart – literaturni syuzheti, tematizatsii, konteksti . Plovdivski universitet/Letera.
Robova, A. (2022). Tvorcheski figuri i kragovrat na izkustvata v prozata na Eric-Emmanuel Schmitt . UI „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“.
Stantcheva, R. L. (2020). Sravnitelnoto literaturoznanie vav vremeto na interdistsiplinarnostta. Balkanski primeri i svetovni vazmozhnosti . Lyuboslovie, (20), 42–60.
Stantcheva, R. L. (2014). Hudozhnikat Zhorzh Papazov kato pisatel. Verbalizatsiya na syurrealnoto. Kolibri.
Tzankova, T. (2023). Portretat v literaturata na Modernizma (Oscar Wilde, James Joyce, José Augusto Trinidad Martínez Ruiz „Asorin“) . Filologicheski forum – Experior.
Brunel, P. (1989a). Introduction. In P. Brunel & Y. Chevrel (Eds.), Précis de littérature comparée (pp. 11–27). PUF.
Brunel, P. (1989b). LITTÉRATURE - La littérature comparée. In Encyclopædia Universalis. Retrieved April 15, 2025, from https://www.universalis.fr/encyclopedie/litterature-la-litterature-comparee/
Brunel, P., Pichois, C., & Rousseau, A.-M. (2009). Qu’est-ce que la littérature comparée? (2e éd.). Armand Colin.
Chevrel, Y. (1989). La littérature comparée (Collection "Que sais-je?"). PUF.
Chevrel, Y. (2023). La Littérature comparée (8e éd.). PUF.
Chevrel, Y., & Brunel, P. (1989). Avant-propos. In P. Brunel & Y. Chevrel (Eds.), Précis de littérature comparée (pp. 9–11). PUF.
Clémenceau, J. (2024). Compte rendu. Colloque international d’Etudes Romanes (CIER), novembre 2023. Philological forum, 10(19), 229–233.
Clerc, J.-M. (1989). La littérature comparée devant les images modernes. Cinéma, photographies, télévision. In P. Brunel & Y. Chevrel (Eds.), Précis de littérature comparée (pp. 263–298). PUF.
Cohn, D. (1981). La transparence intérieure. Modes de représentation de la vie psychique dans le roman. (A. Bony, Trans.). Seuil. (Original work published 1978)
Colonna, V. (2004). Autofiction et autres mythomanies littéraires. Tristram.
Conway, M. A. (2009). Episodic memories. Neuropsychologia, 47(14), 2305–2313.
Conway, M. A., & Loveday, C. (2010). Accessing Autobiographical Memories. In J. H. Mace (Ed.), The act of remembering, toward an understanding of how we recall the past (pp. 56–70). Wiley-Blackwell.
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The Construction of Autobiographical Memories in the Self-Memory System. Psychological Review, 107(2), 261–288.
Doubrovsky, S. (1977). Fils. Galilée.
Franco, B. (2016). La littérature comparée. Histoire, domaines, méthodes. Armand Colin.
Gefen, A. (2021). L’idée de littérature. De l’art pour l’art aux écritures d’intervention. Corti.
Genette, G. (1982). Palimpsestes. La littérature au second degré. Seuil.
Gliksohn, J.-M. (1989). Littératures et arts. In P. Brunel & Y. Chevrel (Eds.), Précis de littérature comparée (pp. 245–262). PUF.
Jakobson, R. (1959). On Linguistic Aspects of Translation. In R. Brower (Ed.), On translation (pp. 232–239). Harvard University Press.
Jenny, L. (1976). La stratégie de la forme. Poétique, 27, 257–281.
Jetchev, G. (2024). Évolution des études romanes en Bulgarie à travers les étapes de développement d’un département universitaire. Philological forum, 10(20), 30–43.
Kristeva, J. (1969). Seméiotiké, recherche pour une sémanalyse. Seuil.
Kundera, M. (2000). Les testaments trahis. Gallimard.
Lejeune, P. (1975). Le Pacte autobiographique. Seuil.
Pichois, C., & Rousseau, A.-M. (1967). La littérature comparée. Armand Colin.
Riffaterre, M. (1979). La Production du texte. Seuil.
Robova, A., & Velinova, M. (2022). Normes et réécritures, mythes et reformulations: le cas des littératures romanes. Philological forum, 8(15), 19–32.
Samoyault, T. (2014). L’intertextualité. Mémoire de la littérature. Armand Colin.
Slavova, K., Boof-Vermesse, I., & Dineva, E. (Eds.). (2018). Visual Worlds: The Aesthetics and Politics of Affect. Mondes visuels: esthétique et politique de l’affect. Polis Publishers.
Velinova, M. (2022). Normes et variations, réécritures des normes : le cas des langues romanes. Philological Forum, 8(16), 17–29.
Zink, M. (2000). Du même au même. Traduire et récrire. In C. Galderisi & G. Salmon (Eds.), Perspectives médiévales, Supplément au numéro 26, Actes du colloque Translatio medievale, Mulhouse, 11-12 mai 2000 (26).
Файлове за сваляне
Публикуван
Брой
Раздел (Секция)
Лиценз
Публикация с Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
