Електронни списания, престиж и икономически аспекти в издаването на научни списания
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.60056/CCL.2016..99-123Абстракт
В статията си „Електронни списания, престиж и икономически аспекти в издаването на научни списания“ Стивън Тотоси де Запетнек и Джошуа Джиа обсъждат съвременното състояние на издателския бранш на академичните списания. Съвременното състояние на отрасъла представлява олигополен, двойно кредитиран модел, в който учените произвеждат продукта си безплатно, само за да могат издателите да получат значителни маржове на печалбата, продавайки този продукт обратно на учените. Издателите могат да постъпват по този начин поради липсата на ценова гъвкавост и слабата способност за преговори на основния им потребител, университетските библиотеки. Способността на издателите да увеличават цените се поддържа също и от това, което авторите наричат „ефект на мултиплицирания престиж“ и „изтласкващ ефект на престижа“, с което обозначават тенденцията библиотеките да орязват откупките от малките издатели, докато големите издатели повишават цените, тъй като големите издатели са по-престижни. Към днешна дата използването на електронните списания не е променило този основен модел. Тотоси де Зепетнек и Джиа твърдят, че за да се стигне до един по-справедлив модел на управление на знанието, който позволява глобалното разпространение на знанието и се противопоставя на „колониализма на знанието“, е необходима промяна в отношението и практиките не само на издателите, но и на учените. Когато схващанията се променят и електронните списания получат престиж, електронното публикуване на научни изследвания ще замести или поне ще стане равнопоставено на престижа на печатните издания.
Литература (библиография)
Adema, J., & Ferwerda, E. (2014). Publication practices in motion: The benefits of open access publishing for the humanities. In P. Dávidházi (Ed.). In: New publication cultures in the humanities: Exploring the paradigm shift (pp. 131–146). Amsterdam University Press.
Anderson, C. (2009). Free: How today's smartest businesses profit by giving something for nothing. Hyperion.
Annual reports CLCWeb: Comparative literature and culture 1999–. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture (Library). http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweblibrary/clcwebannualreports
Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372–382.
Bate, J. (2014, January 10). Open and closed. Times Literary Supplement, 15.
Beall, J. (2013). Beall's list of predatory publishers 2013. Scholarlyoa.com. http://scholarlyoa.com/2012/12/06/bealls-list-of-predatory-publishers-2013
Beals, M. H. (2013). Rapunzel and the ivory tower: How open access will save the humanities (from themselves). Journal of Victorian Culture, 18(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13555502.2013.865977
Bergstrom, T. C. (2001). Free labor for costly journals? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 183–198.
Beverungen, A., Böhm, S., & Land, C. (2012). The poverty of journal publishing. Organization, 19(6), 929–938.
Boletta, M. (2004). Citation patterns in the humanities. Revista de Politica Știinfei și Scientometrie, 2(2), 65–72.
Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the internet. MIT Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Butler, D. (2013). Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature, 495(7442), 433–435.
Cavaleri, P., Keren, M., Ramello, G., & Valli, V. (2009). Publishing an e-journal on a shoe string: Is it a sustainable project? Economic Analysis & Policy, 39(1), 89–101.
CLCWeb: Comparative literature and culture. (1999–). Purdue University Press. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb
Connaway, L. S., & Wicht, H. (2007). What happened to the e-book revolution?: The gradual integration of e-books into academic libraries. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 10(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0010.302
Deutsche Bank AG. (2005, January 11). Reed Elsevier: Moving the supertanker. Company focus: Global equity research report.
Egan, G. (2013, June 6). Green open access can work for the humanities. Times Higher Education. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/comment/opinion/green-open-access-can-work-for-the-humanities/2004323.article
Esposito, J. (2013). Publishing viewed from Santa's crystal ball. Scholarly Kitchen. http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/01/13/publishing-viewed-from-santas-crystal-ball
Eve, M. P. (2014). Open access and the humanities: Contexts, controversies and the future. Cambridge University Press.
Fitzpatrick, K. (2012). Giving it away: Sharing and the future of scholarly communication. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 43(4), 347–362.
Getz, M. (1997). An economic perspective on e-publishing in academia. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 3(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0003.115
Harley, D., & Krzys, S. (Eds.). (2011). Peer review in academic promotion and publishing: Its meaning, locus, and future. University of California, Berkeley.
Hauptman, R. (2008). Documentation: A history and critique of attribution, commentary, glosses, marginalia, notes, bibliographies, works-cited lists, and citation indexing and analysis. McFarland.
History of CLCWeb: Comparative literature and culture. (n.d.). CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture (Library). http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweblibrary/clcwebhistory
Hoyle, R. (2013, June 20). The bottom line is that journals cost money. Times Higher Education. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/comment/opinion/the-bottom-line-is-that-journals-cost-money/2004889.article
Hynes, G. E., & Stretcher, R. H. (2005). Business schools' policies regarding publications in electronic journals. Journal of Education for Business, 81(2), 73–77.
Jeon, D.-S., & Rochet, J.-C. (2009). The pricing of academic journals: A two-sided market perspective. Institut d'Economie Industrielle. http://idei.fr/doc/by/jeon/pricing_journals.pdf
Kirby, P. (2013, July 23). On rejecting journals. The Disorder of Things. http://thedisorderofthings.com/2013/07/25/on-rejecting-journals
Kling, R., Spector, L., & McKim, G. (2002). Locally controlled scholarly publishing via the Internet: The guild model. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 8(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0008.101
Landesman, M., & Van Reenan, J. (2000). Consortia vs. reform: Creating congruence. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 6(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0006.203
Leydesdorff, L., Hammarfelt, B., & Akdag Salah, A. A. (2011). The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12), 2414–2426.
Lieb, T. (2002). Q.A.: Looking forward, looking back. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 7(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0007.306
Long, M. P., & Schonfeld, R. C. (2014). Ithaka S+R US library survey 2013. http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/ithaka-sr-us-library-survey-2013
McGuigan, G. S., & Russell, R. D. (2008). The business of academic publishing: A strategic analysis of the academic journal publishing industry and its impact on the future of scholarly publishing. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 9(3). http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v09n03/mcguigan_g01.html
Meadows, A. (2014). A brighter future for the arts, humanities and social sciences? Scholarly Kitchen. http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/01/02/a-brighter-future-for-the-arts-humanities-and-social-sciences
Michalski, D. (2013). Culture clash: Symbolic capital and the limits to open access journal growth in the humanities and social sciences. ScholarWorks@SJSU. http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/oa-un-conference/2013_Program/Sessions/27/
Miller, T. (2012). Blow up the humanities. Temple University Press.
Monbiot, G. (2011, August 29). Academic publishers make Murdoch look like a socialist. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist
Mukherjee, B. (2007). Evaluating e-contents beyond impact factor: A pilot study selected open access journals in library and information science. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 10(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0010.208
Niu, X., Hemminger, B. M., Lown, C., Adams, S., Brown, C., Level, A., McLure, M., Powers, A., Tennant, M. R., & Cataldo, T. (2010). National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(5), 869–890.
Odlyzko, A. (1998). The economics of electronic journals. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0004.106
Osborne, R. (2013). Why open access makes no sense. In: Debating open access (pp. 96–105). British Academy for the Humanities and Social Sciences.
Porter, M. E. (1979). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, January, 1–17.
Rauch, A. (2010). The scholarly journal: Hindsight toward a digital future. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 42(1), 56–67.
Rochel de Camargo, K. Jr. (2012). The publishing industry against open access journals. Revista de Saúde Pública, 46(6). http://www.scielosp.org/pdf/rsp/v46n6/en_ao4154.pdf
Rohe, T. A. (1998). How does electronic publishing affect the scholarly communication process? Journal of Electronic Publishing, 3(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0003.308
Sanni, S., Ngah, Z., Karim, N., Noorhidawati, A., & Waheed, M. (2013). Using the diffusion of innovation concept to explain the factors that contribute to the adoption rate of e-journal publishing. Serials Review, 39(4), 250–257.
Singer, P. (2000). When shall we be free? Journal of Electronic Publishing, 6(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0006.205
Stevens, L. (2013). Preface: 'Getting what you pay for?' Open access and the future of humanities publishing. Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature, 32(1), 7–21.
Suber, P. (2009). A field guide to misunderstandings about open access. SPARC. http://www.sparc.arl.org/resources/articles/field-guide
Suber, P. (2005). Promoting open access in the humanities. Syllecta Classica, 16, 231–246.
Suber, P. (2010). Thoughts on prestige, quality, and open access. Logos, 21(1-2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/095796510X546959
Sutton, C. (2011, December). Is free inevitable in scholarly communication? The economics of open access. CRLN. http://crln.acrl.org/content/72/11/642.full
Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2008). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. D-Lib Magazine, 14(11-12). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november08/tenopir/11tenopir.html
Long, T. (2014). Journal metrics: From predatory impact services to invalid use of valid measures. CELJ. http://www.celj.org/blog/882
Thompson, J. B. (2005). Books in the digital age: The transformation of academic and higher education publishing in Britain and the United States. Polity Press.
Tötösy de Zepetnek, S. (2010). The 'impact factor' and selected issues of content and technology in humanities scholarship published online. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 42(1), 70–78.
Tötösy de Zepetnek, S. (2007). The new humanities: The intercultural, the comparative, and the interdisciplinary. In J. M. Ziolkowski & A. J. López (Eds.), Globalization and the futures of comparative literature (Thematic Section The Global South, 1.2, pp. 45–68).
Tötösy de Zepetnek, S., & Vasvári, L. O. (2013). About the contextual study of literature and culture, globalization, and digital humanities. In S. Tötösy de Zepetnek & T. Mukherjee (Eds.), Companion to comparative literature, world literatures, and comparative cultural studies (pp. 3–35). Cambridge University Press India.
Varian, H. R. (1998). The future of electronic journals: Some speculations about the evolution of academic electronic publishing. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0004.105
Wheeler, B. (Ed.). (2011). Journal 'ranking' issues and the state of the journal in the humanities: A 2009 CELJ roundtable. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 42(3), 1–44.
Wineburgh-Freed, M. (2007). Scholarly e-journal pricing models and open access publishing. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 4(1), 15–24.
White, A. (2014). Online platforms, economics of. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics online. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230226203.3885
Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. MIT Press.
Wodtke, L., & Reimer, M. (2012). Making change: The cost of 'free'. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, 4(2), 1–14.
Файлове за сваляне
Публикуван
Брой
Раздел (Секция)
Лиценз
Публикация с Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
