Хетеротопии, не-места и други хиазми

Автори

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.60056/CCL.2024..169-180

Ключови думи :

Dismaland, Дисниленд, хетеротопия, дистопия, хиастична структура, не-места

Абстракт

Следната статия разглежда дихотомията между Dismaland, като дистопична инверсия на Дисниленд, a Дисниленд като траен бастион на радостна илюзия. През оптиката на хетеротопията, не-местата и хиазъма, тя изследва как тяхното съвместно съществуване автентично основава едното, докато отчуждава другото. Неволното използване на хиастична структура от Банкси при трансформирането на Dismaland се анализира за неговата реорганизационна логика и предизвикателни норми. Опирайки се на Льофевр, Фуко, Рансиер и Николчина, статията разглежда културни репрезентации, пространства и социални отношения. Анализът се простира до не-места срещу хетеротопии, подчертавайки съпротивата на Dismaland срещу не-местната класификация. Статията се застъпва за хетеротопии, като Dismaland, за оспорване на нормите и насърчаване на алтернативно културно производство, критикувайки интерпретациите на ситуационистките теории и предлагайки пространствената окупация на Рансиер. Заключението изследва как хиастичната структура и хетеротопичното мислене подхранват революционния потенциал на Dismaland, предизвиквайки предварително определени среди и подчертава трансформиращата роля на изкуството в обществената еволюция към обновено съществуване.

Авторска биография

  • Автор: Наталия Атанасова, Софийски университет "Св. Климент Охридски"

    Nataliya Atanasova is a PhD candidate in Philosophy at the University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”. She has completed her Bachelor's degree in Theory of Art at the University of Padova in Italy and her Master's degree in Visual Culture at the University of Westminster in London. Her research interests focus on the intersection of philosophy, visual culture, and technology, with a particular emphasis on contemporary and digital art. Nataliya is interested in exploring radical perspectives within these fields, which offer new and innovative insights into the relationship between art, technology, and society. Her PhD thesis is titled “Catastrophic Imaginaries and Revolutionary Aesthetics: The Situationists’ Aftermath in Contemporary Political Art”.

Литература (библиография)

Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. Verso Books.

Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press.

Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso Books.

Debord, G. (2002). Report on the construction of situation: Guy Debord and the Situationist International: Texts and documents (T. McDonough, Ed.). The MIT Press.

Debord, G. (2014). The society of the spectacle (K. Knabb, Trans.). Bureau of Public Secrets.

Debord, G. (1964). Questionnaire SI. Internationale Situationniste, (9), from https://www.cddc.vt.edu/sionline/si/questionnaire.html

Foucault, M. (1984). Heterotopias, of other spaces. Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, (5), 46–49.

Gumpert, S. S. (2002). Advertising art that advertises itself as art that hates advertising: Jenny Holzer and the truisms of Times Square. Journal of American Studies of Turkey, (16), 77–88.

Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution [Kindle edition].

Isar, N. (2005). Undoing forgetfulness: Chiasmus of poetical mind—A cultural paradigm of archetypal imagination. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 1(3).

Lyotard, J.-F., & Lindsay, C. (1987). Notes on legitimation. Oxford Literary Review, 9(1–2).

Mudie, E. (2013). Disaster and renewal: The praxis of shock in the surrealist city novel. M/C Journal, 16(1).

Nikolchina, M. (2013). Lost unicorns of the velvet revolutions: Heterotopias of the seminar. Fordham University Press.

Nikolchina, M. (2014). Inverted forms and heterotopian homonymy: Althusser, Mamardashvili, and the problem of “man.” Boundary, (1), 79–100.

Nikolchina, M. (2016). Heterotopian homonymy [Video presentation of the concept – 17 mins]. Glossary of Common Knowledge: Commons, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YX-oDEmKknw

Perniola, M. (2004). Art and its shadows. Continuum Press.

Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible (G. Rockhill, Trans.). Continuum Press.

Rancière, J. (2017). The senses and uses of utopia: Political uses of utopia. In S. D. Chrostowska & J. D. Ingram (Eds.), New Marxist, anarchist, and radical democratic perspectives (pp. 219–232). Columbia University Press.

Rancière, J. (2008). The emancipated spectator. Verso Books.

Stob, J. (2014). The paradigms of Nicolas Bourriaud: Situationists as vanishing point. Evental Aesthetics, (4), 23–54.

Vaneigem, R. (2012). The revolution of everyday life (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Rebel Press.

Žižek, S. (2023). Too late to awaken: What lies ahead when there is no future? Penguin Books.

Файлове за сваляне

Публикуван

06-11-2025

Брой

Т. 10 (2024)

Раздел (Секция)

I. Dystopia Traditions, Genre Dynamics, Directions of Transformation

Лиценз

Creative Commons License

Публикация с Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC includes the following elements:

 BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.

Как да цитирате

Хетеротопии, не-места и други хиазми. (2025). Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum, 10, 169-180. https://doi.org/10.60056/CCL.2024..169-180