Апокалиптични измерения

да видиш началото от края

Автори

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.60056/CCL.2023..89-100

Ключови думи :

апокалипсис, катастрофично въображение, не-места, визуално изкуство, творческа деструкция

Абстракт

При анализа на апокалиптичния дискурс е важно да се разграничат пространствените и времевите измерения, в които катастрофата оказва влияние, проправя път за развитието на определен начин на мислене и съответно изгражда подходящ и особен мироглед. Моята цел е да изследвам някои от последствията от въвеждането на дискурса в действие за осъществяване на политическа или социална промяна. Ще бъдат разгледани определени вярвания и конвенции, изградени чрез използването на катастрофичен език, символика и образи. За тази цел ще изследвам как апокалиптичните дискурси оформят начина, по който хората виждат света около себе си, използвайки примери от творчеството на Марио Сирони, Лудвиг Майднер и Стенли Донууд – сравнени с Беняминовия концепт, описващ „разрушителния характер“, подчертавайки начина, по който визуалните дискурси структурират пространството и времето, за да разкрият нова форма на реалност.

Авторска биография

  • Автор: Наталия Атанасова, Софийски университет "Св. Климент Охридски"

    Nataliya Atanasova is a PhD student in Philosophy at the University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”. She has completed her Bachelor's degree in Theory of Art at the University of Padova in Italy and her Master's degree in Visual Culture at the University of Westminster in London. Her research interests focus on the intersection of philosophy, visual culture, and technology, with a particular emphasis on contemporary and digital art. Nataliya is interested in exploring radical perspectives within these fields, which offer new and innovative insights into the relationship between art, technology, and society. Her PhD thesis is titled Catastrophic Imaginaries and Revolutionary Aesthetics: The Situationists’ Aftermath in Contemporary Political Art, which delves into this topic.

Литература (библиография)

Augè, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. Verso Books.

Benjamin, W. (2011). The Destructive Character. In D. Raaijmakers (Ed.), The destructive character. Onomatopee.

Bliss, S. (2013). A brief commentary on The Apocalypse. (J. V. Himes, Ed.). Amazon Kindle Publishing.

Braun, E. (1998). Mario Sironi's Urban Landscapes: The Futurist/Fascist Nexus. In M. Affron & M. Antliff (Eds.), Fascist visions: Art and ideology in France and Italy (pp. 101–134). Princeton University Press.

Cartwright, L., & Sturken, M. (2009). Spectatorship, Power, and Knowledge. In Practice of looking: An introduction to visual culture. OUP USA.

Clark, T. J. (2003). Farewell to an Idea. In J. Geger & P. Wood (Eds.), Art of the twentieth century: A reader (pp. 38–52). Yale University Press.

Derrida, J. (1984a). Of an Apocalyptic Tone Recently Adopted in Philosophy. Oxford Literary Review, 6(2), 3–37.

Derrida, J. (1984b). No Apocalypse, Not Now. Diacritics, (14), 20–31.

deSilva, D. (2009). Seeing things John's way: The rhetoric of the Book of Revelation. John Knox Press.

Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative. Zero Books.

Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History? The National Interest, (16), 3–18.

Herms, R. (2006). An apocalypse for the church and for the world: The narrative function of universal language in the Book of Revelation. De Gruyter.

James, P., & Steger, M. (2013). Levels of Subjective Globalization: Ideologies, Imaginaries, Ontologies. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 12(12), 17–40.

Maier, H. O. (2002). Apocalypse recalled: The Book of Revelation after Christendom. Fortress Press.

Marinetti, F. T. (2003). The Fututrist Manifesto. In C. Harrison & P. Wood (Eds.), Art in theory 1900 – 2000: An anthology of changing ideas (pp. 146–150). Blackwell Publishing.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2008). The Book of Revelation. In On religion (pp. 205–213). Dover Publications.

O’Leary, S. (2012). Arguing the Apocalypse: A theory of millennial rhetoric. Oxford University Press.

Plotke, D. (2006). Democratic Polities and Anti-democratic Politics. Theoria, 53(111), 6–44.

Raaijmakers, D. (2011). The destructive character. Onomatopee 54.

Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration. Columbia University Press.

Sironi, M. (2003). Manifesto of Mural Painting. In C. Harrison & P. Wood (Eds.), Art in theory 1900 – 2000: An anthology of changing ideas (pp. 424–426). Blackwell Publishing.

Williams, A., & Srnicek, N. (2013). Accelerate Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics. Utopian Studies, (24), 216–231.

Файлове за сваляне

Публикуван

06-11-2025

Брой

Т. 9 (2023)

Раздел (Секция)

II. Miscellanea

Лиценз

Creative Commons License

Публикация с Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC includes the following elements:

 BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.

Как да цитирате

Апокалиптични измерения: да видиш началото от края. (2025). Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum, 9, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.60056/CCL.2023..89-100