Opportunities to enhance the economic potential of Bulgaria under the European structural funds

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60054/PEU.2015.2.47-60

Keywords:

European integration, Macroeconomic development of Bulgaria, FDI, EU Structural funds

Abstract

Bulgarian economic integration to EU structures continued to deepen over the past decade. However, the country is facing new challenges in relation to adapt towards the requirements of the highly competitive European Single Market. In the first part ofthe study, we analyse the limits ofBulgarian economic development and the difficulties that arose after the economic crisis in the process of catch up. The long lasting period of low economic growth hindered the efforts to update the macroeconomic indicators and to approach the standard of economic development and sustainability of the EU Central European countries. In the second part the analysis deals with EU structural funds effects on Bulgarian economic development and growth in comparison with other EU Central European countries. We try to underline the effects of EU Structural funds to promote the economic integration of Bulgaria and to enhance the potential for economic development and catch up. Data have been collected from articles, books, National statistical institute of Bulgaria, Eurostat, Bulgarian National Bank and others.


References

Benkovskis, K., and Wortz, J. (2012). Non-Price Competitiveness Gains of Central, Eastern and South-eastern European Countries in the EU Market. Focus on European Economic Integration. Austrian Central Bank.

Borsi, M. T. et al. (2013). The evolution of economic convergence in the EU. Discussion Paper, 28. Deutsche Bundesbank.

BG Competitiveness Review. (2011). p. 9.

Christova-Balkanska, I. (2014). Economic Development of Bulgaria and Romania in the Post Crisis Period. Journal of Financial and Monetary Economies, Annual Review, 1, 2–10. http://jfme.icfm.ro/Revista-JFMR-2014.pdf

Convergence Report. (2014, June). p. 96.

De Grauwe, P., and Schnabl, G. (2004, December). Nominal versus Real Convergence with Respect to EMU Accession EMU Entry Scenarios for the New Member States.

Drastichova, M. (2012). The relations of real and nominal convergence in the EU with impacts on the euro area participation. Economicka review, CEREI, 15, 107–122.

ECB Monthly Bulletin. (2010, July). p. 86, 90, 94.

European Economy 2. (2014). p. 50–51.

European Economy 3. (2014).

European Economic Forecast, Winter, Spring 2014. (2014).

European Structural & Investment Funds, 2014-2020. http://www.eufunds.bg/en/page/31

European Trade Union, EC. http://www.etuc.org

Jedlicka, J., and Rzentarzewska, K. (2014, March). Cohesion Policy and other EU assistance programmes in 2014-2020. EU Office, ERSTE Corporate Banking. (1–22).

http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/

KPMG. (2013). Investment in Bulgaria.

Macroeconomic Imbalances, Bulgaria. (2014).

Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2014, Enterprise and Industry. (2014). EC. p. 24.

Sutour, S., Billot, M. et al. (2012, July). Bulgarian economy continues to operate below its potential. Commission des affaires europeennes, France, Senat.

Tatomir, Cr. (2011). Structural convergence of the Central and Eastern European Countries: Achievements in the Last decade. MPRA, 1–6.

World economic outlook: Recovery strengthens, remain uneven. (2014, April). IMF. p. 54.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-31

Issue

Section

Раздел първи. Европейският съюз - нов старт или рестартиране на познати предизвикателства?