Economic performance of the North Macedonian economy and the EU integration challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60054/PEU.2019.6.217-227Keywords:
Economic growth, North Macedonian economy, EU integration process, export competitivenessAbstract
We investigate the performance of North Macedonian economy in terms of its capacity for acceleration of the real convergence process toward the EU living standards. The holistic growth diagnostic approach is used in order to analyze the country’s growth performance by investigating the current growth model and to identify the main source and the most binding constraint. The results show that the average growth rate of North Macedonian economy in the last two decades is relatively lower than the other countries in the region, which delayed the process of convergence of the country to the level of living standards of the EU Member States. One of the reasons is the lower economic integration of a country with the advanced EU countries in terms of trade integration (the export demand from EU and other countries) and financial integration (FDI inflows and the foreign capital share in the domestic banking sector). There have been expectations that the accession of the country into NATO and its integration in the EU processes will automatically increase the FDI inflows and the trade integration of the country. However, this claim has not been supported by any objective evidence. It is true that the EU and NATO accession may contribute to the acceleration of the country’s development process, but how that process will impact the national economy to a large extent depends on its government capacity to implement structural reforms, its ability to strengthen its institutional capacity, and its ability to design economic and industrial policies most conducive to improve its export competitiveness as a fundamental factor for sustainable economic growth for a small open economy.
References
Lazarov, D., & Azeski, B. (2018). Structural transformation and export diversification as a fundamental factor for acceleration of economic growth in Macedonia. North Macedonian Academy of Science and Arts Proceeding.
Lazarov, D., & Kocovski, M. (2017). Analysis of the development potentials and possibilities for production diversification of the metal industry. Economic Chamber of Macedonia.
Lazarov, D., & Kocovski, M. (2017). Empirical analysis of North Macedonian export structure: the role of metal industry. Industry Journal, 45(1), 148–160.
Lavopa, A., & Szirmai, A. (2014). Structural modernization and development traps: An empirical approach (UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2014-076). United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.
Lavopa, A., & Szirmai, A. (2015). Industrialization in time and space (UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2015-039). United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.
Lee, K. (2013). Schumpeterian Analysis of Economic Catch-up: Knowledge, Path-creation, and the Middle-income Trap. Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 28, 139–91.
Lin, J. Y. (2011). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development. The World Bank Research Observer, 26(2), 193–221.
Lin, J. Y., & Chang, H.-J. (2009). Should industrial policy in developing countries conform to comparative advantage or defy it? A debate between Justin Lin and Ha-Joon Chang. Development Policy Review, 27(5), 483–502.
Lin, J. Y., & Monga, C. (2010). Growth identification and facilitation: The role of the state in the dynamics of structural change (Policy Research Working Paper 5313). World Bank.
Lin, J. Y., & Treichel, V. (2014). Making industrial policy work for development. In J. M. Salazar-Xirinachs, I. Nübler, & R. Kozul-Wright (Eds.), Transforming Economies: Making Industrial Policy Work for Growth, Jobs and Development (pp. 65–78). International Labour Organization.
McMillan, M., & Rodrik, D. (2011). Globalization, structural change and productivity growth. In M. Bacchetta & M. Jansen (Eds.), Making Globalization Socially Sustainable. International Labour Organization.
Palma, G. (2005). Four sources of “de-industrialization” and a new concept of the “Dutch-disease.” In J. A. Ocampo (Ed.), Beyond Reforms, Structural Dynamics and Macroeconomic Vulnerability. Stanford University Press.
Rodrik, D. (2013b). Structural change, fundamentals, and growth: An overview. Institute for Advanced Study.
Rodrik, D. (2014, October 13). Are services the new manufactures? Project Syndicate.
Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21, 1–33.
Romer, P. M. (1987). Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review, 77(2), 56–62.
Rosenstein-Rodan, P. (1943). Problems of industrialisation of Eastern and South-eastern Europe. Economic Journal, 53, 202–211.
Timmer, M. P., de Vries, G., & de Vries, K. (2014b). Patterns of structural change in developing countries (GGDC Research Memorandum 149). Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
Timmer, M. P., Erumban, A. A., Los, B., Stehrer, R., & de Vries, G. J. (2014a). Slicing up global value chains. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 99–118.
UNCTAD. (2014b). The Least Developed Countries Report 2014: Growth with Structural Transformation: A Post-2015 Development Agenda. United Nations.
UNCTAD. (2015a). Global Value Chains and South-South Trade: Economic Cooperation and Integration among Developing Countries. United Nations.
UNIDO. (2015). Industrial Development Report 2016: The Role of Technology and Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development. United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Darko Lazarov, Trajko Slaveski

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.