The role of the member states‘ digital services coordinator for ensuring coordinated and consistent enforcement of the Digital Services Act

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60054/PEU.2023.10.176-187

Keywords:

Digital Services Coordinators, Digital Services Act, coordinated and consistent enforcement, regulatory authorities

Abstract

In 2020, European Commission proposed a legislative package (Digital Services Act and Digital Market Act) to reform the rules governing digital world and to achieve some of the goals set in the Digital Single Market strategy. The regulations aim to create a safer digital space where the fundamental rights of users are protected in the online environment. The Digital Services Act was published in the Official Journal of the EU on the 19th of October 2022. To ensure largely consistent enforcement of the Digital Services Act throughout the Member States, the Act contains extensive enforcement provisions and mechanisms and foresees Digital Service Coordinators to enforce its rules. By 17 February 2024, the Member States will need to communicate the names of their Digital Service Coordinators to the European Commission and to make sure that the appointed Digital Service Coordinators have the capacity to effectively implement the new EU regulation.

This article aims to compare the different approaches chosen by the Member States to ensure coordinated enforcement of the Digital Services Act. This paper argues that the decision for the appointment of the national DSCs is of high importance for building the countries’ enforcement capacity and it is indicative for the way each Member State perceives the scope and the implementation of the DSA. Although the DSCs should fulfil specific requirements, the exact approach chosen by the Member States in the designation process will determine the consistent enforcement of the DSA in all EU countries. Something more, the paper argues that in all Member States is coming the time to debate how to regulate our information ecosystem because the mechanisms and the instruments that once were put in place to manage and to regulate the media and the information system, nowadays, are not well equipped to do so.

References

44thEPRA meeting, Keynote speech for the plenary session on Compliance & Enforcement, Policies, Strategies & Methods of NRAs put to test by Jean-Francois Furnemont, 2016. Available from: https://www.epra.org/attachments/yerevan-plenary-ii-compliance-enforcement-policies-strategies-methodsof-nras-put-to-test-part-ii-keynote-jean-francois-furnemont.

Cabrera Bla ́zquez, F. J., Denis, G., Machet, E., & McNulty, B. (2021). Media regulatory authorities and the challenges of cooperation, IRIS Plus. European Audiovisual Observatory.

Cappello, M. (Ed.). (2019). The independence of media regulatory authorities in Europe, IRIS Special. European Audiovisual Observatory.

Clasen, A. (2023, May 9). Digital Services Act: Germany proposes creation of advisory board. In: Euroactive.de. Available from: https://www.euractiv.com/section/platforms/news/digital-services-act-germany-proposes-creation-of-advisory-board/.

CNMC. (2023). Plan de actuaciones de la CNMC 2023 (p. 51).

EPRA Secretariat. (2016, June). 44th EPRA meeting - Introductory paper for the plenary session on Compliance & Enforcement - Policies, Strategies & Methods of NRAs put to test. Available from: https://www.epra.org/attachments/yerevan-plenary-ii-compliance-and-enforcement-policies-strategiesmethods-put-to-test-part-ii-introductory-paper.

Fell, J. (2008). Media convergence and the implications for media regulation. In: Converging media - convergent regulators? The future of broadcasting regulatory authorities in South-Eastern Europe. Printed at the Council of Europe.

Guide to the Digital Services Act.

Heckova , A., & Smith, S. (2023, June 14). Country report: Slovakia. In N. Newman et al. (Eds.), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023. University of Oxford. Available from: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023/slovakia.

Henry, A. (2021, April 4). Media Commission to have Digital Services Act role in Ireland. In: Pinsent Masons. Available from: https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/media-commission-digital-services-act-role-in-ireland.

Mansell, R., Livingstone, S., Beckett, C., & Tambini, D. (2019). Tackling the Information Crisis: A Policy Framework for Media System Resilience. London School of Economics.

Meta, F. (2021, June 15). Lasorella: “Agcom has the requirements to fill the role of Italian Digital Service Coordinator”. In: CorCom. Available from: https://www.corrierecomunicazioni.it/digital-economy/lasorella-agcom-ha-i-requisiti-per-ricoprire-il-ruolo-di-digital-service-coordinator-italiano/.

Official site of The Communications Regulatory Authority, Italy. Available from: https://www.agcom.it/che-cos-e-l-autorita.

Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act). (2022).

Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). (2022).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

Issue

Section

Third panel: EU MEDIA POLICY AND HOW TO PROTECT FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN THE DIGITAL AGE