Tackling disinformation online with media literacy by design and community-centred platform regulation

the Wikipedia model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60054/PEU.2025.12.244-260

Keywords:

platform governance, digital public sphere, media literacy, participatory culture, information integrity

Abstract

This paper examines Wikipedia’s participatory governance model as a framework for informing European digital public sphere development. Through analysis of Wikipedia’s two-decade experience with community-driven content moderation, reliable source verification, and decentralized decision-making, the study demonstrates how public-interest platforms can maintain information quality while fostering democratic participation. Drawing on Henry Jenkins’ participatory culture theory, the research shows how Wikipedia’s collaborative editing processes naturally develop users’ media literacy competencies through active engagement rather than passive consumption. The paper analyses Wikipedia’s recent regulatory experiences under the EU Digital Services Act and European Media Freedom Act, highlighting both compliance challenges and opportunities for policy learning. The findings suggest that adapting Wikipedia’s model could inform the design of a European digital public sphere that prioritizes information quality, user empowerment, and democratic discourse over commercial engagement metrics.

References

ACM. (2018). Proc. of the 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym ’18). ACM, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3233391.3233544 https://www.opensym.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/OpenSym2018_paper_15-1.pdf

Albon, C., & Zia, L. (2025). Our new AI strategy puts Wikipedia’s humans first. Wikimedia Foundation.

Allioui, S. (2024). EU media freedom act: The convolutions of the new legislation. EU Law Analysis. http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2024/06/eu-media-freedom-act-convolutions-of.html

Bradley-Schmieg, P. (2023). Wikipedia is now a very large online platform (VLOP) under new European Union rules: Here’s what that means for Wikimedians and readers. Diff.

Butler, B., Joyce, E., & Pike, J. (2008). Don’t look now, but we’ve created a bureaucracy: The nature and roles of policies and rules in Wikipedia. In Proc. CHI 2008 (pp. 1101–1110).

The Economist. (2021, May 26). Wikipedia is 20, and its reputation has never been higher.

EU Policy Team. (2024). Wikipedia and the digital services act: Lessons on the strength of community and the future of internet regulation. Wikimedia Europe. https://wikimedia.brussels/wikipedia-and-the-digital-services-act-lessons-on-the-strength-of-community-and-the-future-of-internet-regulation/

EU Policy Team. (2025). Wikipedia recognized as a digital public good. Wikimedia Europe.

Failla, M. (2023). European media freedom act: Some reflections from Wikimedia Europe. Wikimedia Europe. https://wikimedia.brussels/european-media-freedom-act-some-reflections-from-wikimedia-europe

Grimmelmann, J. (2015). The virtues of moderation. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 17, 42.

https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/transparency/2024-2/eu-digital-services-act-information/

Jenkins, H. (2007). What Wikipedia can teach us about the new media literacies (part two). Henryjenkins.org. http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2007/06/what_wikipedia_can_teach_us_ab_1.html

Jenkins, H., Ito, N., & Boyd, D. (2015). Participatory culture in a networked era : A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. Polity Press.

Kharazian, Z., et al. (2024). Governance capture in a self-governing community: A qualitative comparison of the Croatian, Serbian, Bosnian, and Serbo-Croatian Wikipedias. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 8(CSCW1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3637338

McDowell, Z. J., & Vetter, M. A. (2020). It takes a village to combat a fake news army: Wikipedia’s community and policies for information literacy. Social Media + Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120937309

McDowell, Z. J., & Vetter, M. A. (2021). Wikipedia and the representation of reality (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003094081

Morgan, J., & Halfaker, A. (2018). Evaluating the impact of the Wikipedia teahouse on newcomer socialization and retention. In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym ’18).

Reagle J. (2010). Good faith collaboration: The culture of Wikipedia. MIT Press, p. 52.

Rijshouwer, E. et al. (2023). Wikipedia: A self-organizing bureaucracy. Information, Communication & Society, 26(7), 1285–1302. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2021.1994633

Wikimedia Education. (2021). Reading Wikipedia in the classroom. Final report.

Wikimedia Foundation. (2023). Wikimedia foundation contribution to the global digital compact. Un.org.

Wikimedia Foundation. (2023). Wikimedia in education. https://wikimediafoundation.org/our-work/education/

Wikimedia Foundation. (2024). EU digital services act information. https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/transparency/2023-2/eu-digital-services-act-information/

Wikimedia Foundation. (2024). Transparency report - July to December 2024. EU digital services act information.

Wikimedia Foundation. (n.d.). Motivating factors for users to contribute to content on the internet in The Wikimedia brand health tracker. Anti-Disinformation Repository.

Wikipedia. Reliable sources: Verifiability. Wikipedia in English.

Wikipedia. WikiProject reliability. Wikipedia in English.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-07

Issue

Section

Third panel: DIS/INFORMATION AND ONLINE PLATFORMS IN THE EU