Възможна ли е демокрацията в Европейския съюз? Институционални траектории след Договора от Лисабон
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.60054/PEU.2015.2.111-120Абстракт
В академичната литература през последните няколко години оживено се дискутира модела на „демой-крация“ като възможност за устойчиво развитие на интеграционния процес. В настоящата статия се проследяват траекториите на институциите на Европейския съюз след Договора от Лисабон от гледна точка на модела на демой-крация и се правят някои изводи за потенциалната приложимост на този модел в ЕС.
Литература (библиография)
Georgiev, V. (2015). Tertium non datur: parlamentarizatsia na integratsionnata obshtnost ili nova zadanena ulitsa? Godishen sbornik na katedra “Evropeistika” (2015).
Barnard, C. (2014). EU Employment Law and the European Social Model: The Past, the Present and the Future. Current Legal Problems, 67(1), 199–237.
Bellamy, R. (2013). ‘An Ever Closer Union Among the Peoples of Europe’: Republican Intergovernmentalism and Demoicratic Representation within the EU. Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 499–516.
Bellamy, R., & Castiglione, D. (2013). Three models of democracy, political community and representation in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(2), 206–223.
Buess, M. (2015). European Union agencies and their management boards: an assessment of accountability and demoi-cratic legitimacy. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(1).
Cheneval, F., Lavenex, S., & Schimmelfennig F. (2015). Demoi-cracy in the European Union: principles, institutions, policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(1).
Coultrap, J. (1999). From Parliamentarism to Pluralism: Models of Democracy and the European Union’s Democratic Deficit. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 107–135.
Fitoussi, J., & Saraceno, F. (2013). European economic governance: the Berlin-Washington Consensus. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(3), 479–496.
Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs. M. (2015). Research Agenda: The European integration of core state powers. Paper for EUSA 2015, Boston, March 4-6.
Glencross, A. (2014). Politics of European Integration: Political Union or a House Divided? Wiley Blackwell.
Lannoo, K. (2014, September 11). The Juncker Commission: A bold bid to restore the College. CEPS Commentaries.
Lindseth, P. L. (2014). Equilibrium, Demoi-cracy, and Delegation in the Crisis of European Integration. German Law Journal, 15, 529–559.
Marxsen, C. (2015). Open Stakeholder Consultations at the European Level - Voice of the Citizens? European Law Journal, 21, 257–280.
Menendez, A. J. (2009). The European Democratic Challenge: The Forging of a Supranational Volonté Générale. European Law Journal, 15(3), 277–308.
Panico, C., & Purificato, F. (2013). Policy coordination, conflicting national interests and the European debt crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(3), 585–608.
Puetter, U. (2014). The European Council and the Council: New Intergovernmentalism and Institutional Change. Oxford University Press.
Szczerbiak, A. (2001). Polish Public Opinion: Explaining Declining Support for EU Membership. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(1), 105–122.
Weiler, J. (2012). In the face of crisis: Input legitimacy, output legitimacy and the political messianism of European integration. Journal of European Integration, 34(7), 825–841.
Weiler, J. H. H., Haltern, U., & Mayer, F. R. (1995). European Democracy and its Critique: Five Uneasy Pieces. European University Institute.
