Legal implications of data mining for journalistic purposes
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.60054/PEU.2023.10.205-217Ключови думи :
Freedom of information, text and data mining, machine learning, copyright, privacy, journalismАбстракт
Access to information, and data in particular, is a necessary condition for carrying out journalistic activity as an important pillar of free and democratic societies. And while freedom of expression and of the press traditionally may come into conflict with the protection of privacy or intellectual property as fundamental rights, the use of new technological forms such as text and data mining for journalistic purposes is creating an entirely new set of legal implications for the exercise of freedom of information. The present study focuses on the issues arising in the fields of copyright, personal data protection, open data, data governance etc. in connection with the use of data and creative materials as an input to machine learning models in the context of journalism.
Литература (библиография)
Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 13-4829-cv (2d Cir. Oct. 16, 2015).
Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust, 755 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2014).
Bramer, M. (2007). Principles of data mining (Vol. 180, p. 2). Springer.
Bulgarian Personal Data Protection Law, amendment published in SG No. 17 of 2019.
Carroll, M. (2019). Copyright and the Progress of Science: Why Text and Data Mining Is Lawful’. UC Davis Law Review, 53, 893.
Communia Association. (2020). Guidelines for Implementation of the DSM Directive. https://www.communia-association.org/2019/12/02/guidelines-implementation-dsm-directive/.
Decision quand au fond 13/2022 du 27 janvier 2022 de la Chambre Contentieuse de l’Autoritå ́ de protection des donnees, N° de dossier: DOS-2018-04433. Disponible sur: https://www.autoriteprotectiondonnees.be/publications/decision-quant-au-fond-n-13-2022.pdf.
Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases (OJ L 77, 27.3.1996).
Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society [2001] OJ L167/01.
Directive 2006/116/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights (OJ 2006 L 372).
Directive 2012/28/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on certain permitted uses of orphan works Text with EEA relevance, OJ L 299, 27.10.2012.
Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC, OJ L-130/92 of 17 May 2019.
Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector information (recast), OJ L 172, 26.6.2019.
Dusollier, S. (2016). Scoping Study on Copyright and Related Rights and the Public Domain. World Intellectual Property Organisation Publication.
Escribano, B., & Fontanals, S. (2022). The Data Act: new EU rules for data sharing. https://www.ey.com/en_es/law/the-data-act-new-eu-rules-for-data-sharing.
Joseph, H. (2015). The Right to Read is the Right to Mine... https://sparcopen.org/news/2015/the-right-to-read-is-the-right-to-mine/.
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 April 2014 in the case C435/12, ACI Adam BV v. Stichting de Thuiskopie, Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:254.
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 January 2015 Ryanair Ltd v. PR Aviation BV, case C30/14 [2015] ECLI:EU:C:2015:10.
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 April 2017 in the case C-527/15, Stichting Brein (Filmspeler) [2017] EU:C:2017:300.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-5/08, Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening [2009] ECLI:EU:C:2009:465.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-203/02, British Horseracing Board Ltd v William Hill [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:695.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-145/10, Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH and Others [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:798.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-604/10, Football Dataco Ltd et al. vs. Yahoo UK Ltd [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:115.
Kotenidis, E., & Veglis, A. (2021). Algorithmic Journalism-Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Journalism and Media, 2(2), 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2020014.
Lazarova, A. (2021). Re-use the news: between the EU press publishers’ right’s addressees and the informatory exceptions’ beneficiaries. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 16(3), 236.
Lazarova, A. (2022). Contractual override of copyright exceptions. Contemporary Law, 4/2021.
Polish Personal Data Protection Office (UODO) v. Bisnode, ZSPR.421.3.2018 (2019). Available at: https://uodo.gov.pl/decyzje/ZSPR.421.3.2018.
Proposal for a Regulation laying down measures for a high level of public sector interoperability across the Union (Interoperable Europe Act), COM(2022) 720 final, 2022/0379 (COD).
Proposal for a Regulation on European data governance (Data Governance Act) COM(2020) 767 final, 2020/0340(COD).
Proposal for a Regulation on harmonised rules on fair access to and use of data (Data Act) COM(2022) 68 final, 2022/0047(COD).
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1-88.
Regulation (EU) 2018/1807 on a framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union (Regulation on free flow of non-personal data).
Rutgers Bootcamps. (2022). What Is Data Mining? A Beginner’s Guide. https://bootcamp.rutgers.edu/blog/what-is-data-mining/.
Sag, M. (2018). The new legal landscape for text mining and machine learning. J. Copyright Soc’y USA, 66, 291.
Sun, H. (2021). Creating a Public Interest Principle for the Adjudication of Fair Use and Fair Dealing Cases. In The Cambridge Handbook of Copyright Limitations and Exceptions (p. 233). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108671101.019.
Trapova, A., & Mezei, P. (2022). Robojournalism - A Copyright Study on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the European News Industry. GRUR International, 71(7), 589.
Ufarte-Ruiz, M. J., Murcia-Verdu ́, F. J., & Tunez-Lopez, J. M. (2023). Use of artificial intelligence in synthetic media: first newsrooms without journalists. Profesional de la informacion, 32(2).
Yildirim, E., Van Houweling Shaffer, M., Lazarova, A., & Vezina, B. (2023). Freedom to Share: How Government’s Data Sharing Policies Concerning Publicly Available Data Impact Academic Research and Journalism in the Public Interest. Creative Commons Medium Blog. https://medium.com/creative-commons-we-like-to-share/freedom-to-share-how-governments-data-sharing-policies-concerning-publicly-available-data-impact-d09cb736aebf.
Zhuhadar, L., & Ciampa, M. (2019). Leveraging learning innovations in cognitive computing with massive data sets: Using the offshore Panama papers leak to discover patterns. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 507.
