Countering disinformation in Bulgaria

what is achieved under the EU framework and why not more?

Автори

  • Mariya Yurukova Софийски университет "Св. Климент Охридски" image/svg+xml

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.60054/PEU.2022.9.222-235

Ключови думи :

Countering online disinformation, implementation of the EU instruments, Bulgaria, Code of practice, Rapid alert system

Абстракт

The EU efforts to create a disinformation-proof media ecosystem are fundamental to Europe’s recovery. Especially in the light of the current events like the Covid-19 pandemic that led to an infodemic and the war in Ukraine that is accompanied by information war, the capacity of the EU to maintain access to quality information in all Member States is a primary task.

In some countries the vulnerability of the society to disinformation narratives has reached high levels. The degree of coherence and similarity in the implementation of the European Approach to combating disinformation between the Member States is not sufficient. The low media literacy and the low trust in media are additional obstacles to the EU revival in time of crises. Therefore, this paper is focusing on Bulgaria as one of the EU Member States facing greater challenges in the field.

Despite the existence of common EU tools for countering disinformation like the Code of Practice, the Rapid Alert System, etc., the results in Bulgaria are still very limited. This paper argues that in order to be possible for countries as Bulgaria to achieve more in the field, further political, institutional and coordination efforts should be made among the separate Member States, but also at supranational level to better implement EU instruments to tackle disinformation. The study used a descriptive and analytical method research.

Литература (библиография)

Angelov, B. (2021). Proverkata na fakti v online mediate v Bulgaria. In Sbornik s dokladi ot mezdunarodna konferentsia (p. 215). UI SU “Sv. Kliment Ohridski.”

Lesenski, M. (2021). Index na mediinata gramotnost 2021: Dvoina zaplaha: Ustoichivost na falshivi novini po vreme na “infodemiyata” ot Covid-19.

Ognyanova, N. (2021). “Nyama da ima Ministerstvo na istinata v ES”:po sledite na edno obeshtanie. In Sbornik s dokladi ot mezdunarodna konferentsia (pp. 92–118). UI SU “Sv. Kliment Ohridski.”

Yurukova, M. (2021). ES v protses na tursene na resheniya za spraviyane s dezinformatsiyata online - vuzmojni podhodi. In Sbornik s dokladi ot mezdunarodna konferentsia (pp. 151–172). UI SU “Sv. Klimend Ohridski.”

Yurukova, M. (2022). Dezinformatsiya online: strategii za prodivodeistvie v ES.

AVAAZ. (2021, April 20). Left Behind: How Facebook is neglecting Europe’s infodemic. https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/facebook_neglect_europe_infodemic/

European Commission. (2018a). Tackling online disinformation: a European Approach (COM(2018) 236 final).

European Commission. (2018b). Action Plan against Disinformation (JOIN(2018) 36 final).

European Commission. (2020). On the European democracy action plan (COM(2020) 790 final).

European Commission. (n.d.). Official website of European Commission.

European Commission (EC). (2021). Bulgaria country report. In The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI).

European Broadcasting Union. (2021). Trust in media 2021.

European Court of Auditors. (2021). Special Report 09/2021: Disinformation affecting the EU: tackled but not tamed.

Freedom House. (2022). Freedom in the world 2022: Bulgaria. https://freedomhouse.org/country/bulgaria/freedom-world/2022

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andı, S., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2021). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. University of Oxford.

Speedtest Global Index. (2022). Global Median Speeds August 2022. https://www.speedtest.net/global-index

Файлове за сваляне

Публикуван

2022-12-31

Брой

Раздел (Секция)

THIRD PART: EUROPEAN IDENTITY, EDUCATION AND CULTURE