“It is not only the economy, stupid”

the importance of national and European identity for the future of Europe

Authors

  • Eckart D. Stratenschulte German National Foundation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60054/PEU.2018.5.179-190

Keywords:

European integration, European identity, national identity

Abstract

The European Union has always been a political project, using the economy as instrument to reach the political goals. Therefore, a European identity is of utmost importance for the success of the European integration process. European identity is not the contrary of a national identity but the result of the combination of national identities. The French philosopher François Jullien recommends replacing identity differentiation, which is always exclusive as well as inclusive, with the concept of distance. According to this concept, differences in cultures are certainly taken into account, but they are not used for exclusion, but to construct a greater common whole.

References

Conclusions of the executive committee. European Council. (1989, December 8/9). Section III. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/20574/1989_dezember_-strassburg__de.pdf; last accessed on: 31 March 2018.

European Commission. (2017, March 1). White Paper on the Future of Europe. Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/white_paper_on_the_future_of_europe_en.pdf; last accessed on: 12 April 2018.

European Union. (1950, May 9). The Schuman Declaration – 9 May 1950. https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/symbols/europe-day/schuman-declaration_en; last accessed on: 31 March 2018.

Gehler, M. (2018). Europa (3rd ed.). Reinbek.

Jullien, F. (2018). Es gibt keine kulturelle Identität (3rd ed.).

Kantner, C. (2006). Collective Identity as Shared Ethical Self-Understanding. The Case of the Emerging Identity. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(4), 501–523.

Letter by Adenauer to Erhard, 13.04.1956. (1998). Quoted from: T. Geiger, Ludwig Erhard und die Anfänge der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft. In R. Hrbek (Ed.), 40 Jahre Römische Verträge: der deutsche Beitrag; Dokumentation der Konferenz anlässlich des 90. Geburtstages von Dr. h.c. Hans von der Groeben (pp. 50-64, p. 53). Nomos.

Macron, E. (2017, September 26). Initiative for Europe, Sorbonne Speech. http://international.blogs.ouest-france.fr/archive/2017/09/29/macron-sorbonne-verbatim-europe-18583.html; last accessed on: 12 April 2018.

Marx, K. (1972). Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie. In K. Marx & F. Engels, Werke (MEW) (Vol. 1, p. 385).

Mundell, R. A. (1961). A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. The American Economic Review, 51(4), 657-665.

The Rome Declaration. Declaration of the leaders of 27 member states and of the European Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission. (2017, March 25). Statements and Remarks 149/17. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/03/25/rome-declaration/pdf; last accessed on: 31 March 2018.

Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community. (1951, April 18). Preamble. https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/1997/10/13/11a21305-941e-49d7-a171-ed5be548cd58/publishable_en.pdf; last accessed on: 31 March 2018.

Treaty on the European Union. (2012). Art. 21 (1). Official Journal C 326. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:12012M/TXT&from=EN; last accessed on: 31 March 2018.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

Issue

Section

Раздел трети. „Сигурност и стабилност в силна и обединена Европа“