The statement about the retreat from multiculturalism in Europe beyond superficial political rhetoric

Автори

  • Lachezar Antonov South-West University “Neofit Rilski”

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.60054/PEU.2024.11.155-162

Ключови думи :

multiculturalism, neo-assimilationism, group rights, identity politics, diversity management

Абстракт

During the last quarter of the 20th century there was a clear trend across Western European democracies toward an increased recognition and accommodation of diversity through a range of multicultural policies and ethno-cultural and religious minority rights. Since the mid-1990s, all these multicultural policies and established measures to grant additional rights to minorities, have met with serious public and political resistance. This shift in the public attitudes (actively voiced by politicians from across the political spectrum) from tolerant multicultural acceptance of cultural diversity towards civic-integrationism and neo-assimilationism (that treat cultural
diversity in a completely different way), has given rise to a phenomenon that has got the name of “the retreat from multiculturalism”. The present text is dedicated to the critical reconstruction of this phenomenon and to the verification of the validity of the main claims and arguments underlying it.

Литература (библиография)

Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Harvard University Press.

Antonov, L. (2019). Multiculturalism and the Limits of Toleration. Paradigma. (in Bulgarian)

Banting, K., & Kymlicka, W. (2020). Multiculturalism Policies in Contemporary Democracies. Retrieved May 29, 2024, from https://www.queensu.ca/mcp

Bowen, J. (2011, July/August). Europeans Against Multiculturalism: Political Attacks Misread History, Target Muslims, and May Win Votes. Boston Review.

Brubaker, R. (2001). The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and its Sequels in France, Germany and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548.

Gans, H. J. (1999). Toward a Reconciliation of “Assimilation” and “Pluralism”: The Interplay of Acculturation and Ethnic Retention. In C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz, & J. DeWind (Eds.), The Handbook of International Migration: The American Experience (pp. 161–171). Russell Sage Foundation.

Hall, S. (2000). Conclusion: The Multicultural Question. In B. Hesse (Ed.), Un/settled Multiculturalisms (pp. 209–241). Zed Books.

Halm, D., & Sauer, M. (2006). Parallelgesellschaft und Ethnische Schichtung. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, (1-2), 18–24.

Heitmeyer, W. (1996). Fuer Tuerkische Jugendliche in Deutschland Spielt der Islam Einewichtige Rolle. Die Zeit. http://www.zeit.de/1996/35/heitmey.txt.19960823.xml

Joppke, C. (2004). The Retreat of Multiculturalism in the Liberal State: Theory and Policy. British Journal of Sociology, 55(2), 237–257.

McLennan, G. (2001). Can There Be a ‘Critical’ Multiculturalism? Ethnicities, 1(3), 389–422.

Meyer, T. (2002). Parallelgesellschaft und Demokratie. In T. Meyer & R. Weil (Eds.), Die Bürgergesellschaft. Perspektiven für Bürgerbeteiligung und Bürgerkommunikation (pp. 343–372). Dietz.

Schiffauer, W. (2008). Parallelgesellschaften. Wie viel Wertekonsens braucht unsere Gesellschaft? transcript.

Werbner, P. (1997). Afterword: Writing Multiculturalism and Politics in the New Europe. In T. Modood & P. Werbner (Eds.), The Politics of Multiculturalism in the New Europe: Racism, Identity and Community (pp. 261–267). Zed Books.

Файлове за сваляне

Публикуван

2024-12-31

Брой

Раздел (Секция)

Third panel: EUROPEAN IDENTITY, EDUCATION, SKILLS AND CULTURE