Possessive and argument pronouns with deverbal nouns in Russian and French

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60056/SE.2026.1.22-35

Keywords:

nominalization, argument pronouns, possessive pronouns, emphasis, coordination

Abstract

The article focuses on the use of argument and possessive pronouns with Russian and French nominalizations. In both languages, possessive pronouns are used with nominalizations by default, while argument pronouns are only compatible with certain contexts and bear an intonational and semantic emphasis. Argument pronouns are used in contexts of emphasis on the argument, especially when the subject and the object of the base verb are co-referent. Semantically, argument pronouns prefer dynamic readings of nominalizations, because this type of reading inherits the use of argument pronouns from the base verbs. Finally, the use of argument pronouns is influenced by syntactic factors: coordination contexts favor argument pronouns because of the syntactic parallelism requirement. Another context property of use of argument pronouns is constituted by cases, where a nominalization has other arguments, besides the pronoun – this construction type prevents the argument pronoun from being focused. Another problem addressed in the article concerns the object vs. subject reading of the possessive pronoun: the choice of the reading is mainly regulated by the semantic class of the nominalization.

Author Biographies

References

Lyutikova, Ye. A., 2001. Kognitivnaya tipologiya: Refleksivy i intensifikatory. Moskva: IMLI RAN.

Paducheva, Ye. V., 1984. Prityazhatel'noye mestoimeniye i problema zaloga otglagol'nogo imeni. V: Grigoriyev, V.P. (otv. red.). Problemy strukturnoy lingvistiki 1982. Moskva: Nauka, s. 50-66.

Pazel'skaya, A. G., 2006. Nasledovaniye glagol'nykh kategoriy imenami situatsiy: na materiale russkogo yazyka: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Moskva: MGU.

Vinogradov, V. V., 1947. Russkiy yazyk. Grammaticheskoye ucheniye o slove. Moskva, Leningrad: Uchpedgiz.

Balvet, A., Barque, L., Condette, M.H., Haas, P., Huyghe, R., Marin, R., Merlo, A., 2011. La ressource Nomage. Confronter les attentes théoriques aux observations du comportement linguistique des nominalisations en corpus. Revue TAL: traitement automatique des langues, Ressources Linguistiques Libres, 52 (3), pp. 129–152.

De Cuba, C., 2017. Noun complement clauses as referential modifiers. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.53

Grimshaw, J., 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., 1993. Nominalizations. London: Routledge.

Riegel, M., Pellat, J.-Ch., Rioul, R., 1994. Grammaire métodique du français. Paris: Presses universitaires de France (PUF).

Rudnev, P., Volkova. A., 2020. Case marking in Russian eventive nominalisations revisited. Russian Linguistics, 44 (2), pp. 157–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-020-09228-9

Downloads

Published

2026-07-03

Issue

Section

CONTRASTIVE STUDIES

How to Cite

Possessive and argument pronouns with deverbal nouns in Russian and French. (2026). Contrastive Linguistics, 1, 22-35. https://doi.org/10.60056/SE.2026.1.22-35